MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Residual Physiological And Functional Benefits Following A Year Of Resistance Training In Older Adults

2005· article· en· W4242141951 on OpenAlexaff
Janna S. Wentzell, Darren Kruisselbrink, Jonathon R. Fowles, René J.L. Murphy

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhysical Activity and Health
Canadian institutionsAcadia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePhysical therapyAnthropometryResistance trainingRepeated measures designAnalysis of varianceStrength trainingFunctional trainingLeg pressGrip strengthGerontologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Long term participation in home-based exercise training programs using household items, resistance tubing, exercise balls, and hand exercisers have been shown to provide significant health benefits for older adults. However, little is known about the long term impact of these exercise interventions on older individuals. PURPOSE The goal of this study was to assess the residual effects 12 months following a year long moderate intensity resistance training program in older adults. METHODS Thirty two retired individuals over 55 years of age were recruited to participate in a year long monitored home-based moderate intensity resistance training program. Pre- and post-testing included anthropometric, physical, physiological and functional testing. At the completion of the study, each participant was provided information and retained the Thera-Band ® equipment to continue to perform the exercises at home. After completion of the 12 month training program, no monitoring was provided. One year after the post-testing, participants were invited to return to the lab for follow up testing and 26 agreed. At the initial assessment, these 11 males and 15 females were, on average 65.6±7.53 years, weighed 70.2±10.3 kg, and measured 167.3±8.9 cm (means ± SD). The effects of the year long training program and the 12 month follow up period were assessed using a repeated measures ANOVA. Significance was accepted at p<0.05. RESULTS Grip strength and isokinetic leg flexion and extension torques were significantly increased by training and maintained at follow up. Systolic blood pressure decreased significantly after training and was also reduced at follow up. Fast self-paced walking speed and functional reach were unchanged by training but were improved at follow up. Body mass, sum of skinfolds, resting heart rate, diastolic blood pressure, sit and reach, timed up and go and 6 minute walk test results were unchanged following training and at follow up testing. CONCLUSION These results demonstrate that there are significant residual benefits one year after the completion of a long term, monitored exercise training program. Implementation of long duration behavior modification strategies to increase strength and physical activity in older individuals, like this monitored home-based resistance exercise training program, are likely to have significant residual benefits on the health and quality of life of the participants. Supported by EKM Health Foundation, Nova Scotia Health Research Foundation and Thera-Band®.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicPhysical Activity and Health→French-language works237,207→