MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242195281 · doi:10.1142/s0129156401001088

RF CMOS RELIABILITY

2001· article· en· W4242195281 on OpenAlex
Sasan Naseh, M. Jamal Deen

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of High Speed Electronics and Systems · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor materials and devices
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNMOS logicCMOSReliability (semiconductor)TransistorAmplifierHot-carrier injectionMaterials scienceElectrical engineeringElectronic engineeringElectronic circuitNoise (video)OptoelectronicsVoltagePower (physics)EngineeringComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this chapter the effects of hot carrier on the reliability of NMOS transistors are investigated. First, it is explained why the hot carrier issue can be important in RF CMOS circuits. Important mechanisms of hot carrier generation are reviewed and some of the techniques used in the measurement of hot carrier damages are explained. Next, results of measurement of DC hot carrier stress on the NMOS transistors are presented. The main focus here is the RF performance of the NMOS devices and circuits mode of them, but DC parameters of the device such as its I-V characteristics and threshold voltage are presented, as they directly affect the RF performance. Finally, using the measurements of hot carrier effects on single NMOS transistors, the effects of hot carriers on three parameters of a low noise amplifier, matching, power gain and stability, are predicted using circuit simulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.805
Threshold uncertainty score0.289

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it