MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242236602 · doi:10.2118/2003-178

Use of Evaporation for Heavy Oil Produced Water Treatment

2003· article· en· W4242236602 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
W. Heins, D. Peterson

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian International Petroleum Conference · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEvaporationEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Heavy oil recovery processes have traditionally used "once through" steam generators (OTSG) to produce high pressure steam for injection into geological formations containing heavy oil. The heat given up by the condensing steam fluidizes the heavy oil and allows the oil/water mixture to be brought to the surface. The oil is recovered as product and the water, referred to as produced water, is de-oiled and treated for feedwater to the OTSG. The typical treatment method for produced water is warm or hot lime softening (WLS or HLS), filtration, and weak acid cation exchange (WAC). An alternative method of produced water treatment is vertical tube, falling film, vapor compression evaporation. This method:eliminates physicalchemical produced water treatment,results in lower lifecycle costs,does not produce any softener sludge for disposal,minimizes the number and volume of waste streams requiring disposal,requires fewer maintenance materials and less maintenance labor,reduces the required amount of produced water de-oiling equipment,dramatically increases OTSG feed water quality, improving OTSG reliability,and provides increased system availability and reliability. For steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) processes, which require 100% quality steam, it has the added advantage of producing water of sufficient quality for use in standard packaged boilers in lieu of OTSG. Packaged boilers are less expensive than OTSG, produce a much smaller liquid blowdown stream, and results in a boiler feed system which is 20% smaller than that of an OTSG. Introduction The uncertainties of world politics have promoted the need for diverse sources of world oil supply. The oil reserves located in Canada, specifically Northern Alberta, are vast and production of these reserves is increasing at a fast pace. Current recovery of this oil resource requires utilization of another valued resource, water. Heavy oil recovery requires large volumes of water commensurate in volume to the production of oil that it yields. Water is used in the form of steam to heat the geological formations that hold the oil. The oil is fluidized by the condensing steam and the oil/water mixture is pumped to the surface. The oil and water are separated. The oil is recovered as product and the water, referred to as produced water, is de-oiled and treated for reuse in the steam generator. Traditionally, "once-through" steam generators (OTSG) have been used to produce 80% quality steam (80% vapor, 20% liquid) for injection into the well. A relatively new heavy oil recovery process, referred to as Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD), requires 100% quality steam to be injected into the well (i.e., no liquid water). To produce 100% quality steam using once-through steam generators, a series of vapor-liquid separators are required to separate the liquid water from the steam. The 100% quality steam is then injected into the well. For both SAGD and non-SAGD applications, the produced water can generally be characterized as predominantly sodium chloride brine with high silica and minimal calcium and magnesium. High alkalinity, or carbonates, is present as well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.182
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian International Petroleum ConferenceSame topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207