MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242264728 · doi:10.24036/student.v4i1.804

[no title]

2020· article· W4242264728 on OpenAlexaff
Gebi Permata Sari, Yurni Suasti

Bibliographic record

VenueJURNAL BUANA · 2020
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCoastal Management and Development
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesForestryGeographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstrak
 Manusia tidak pernah lepas dari segala masalah yang berhubungan dengan tempat dimana manusia bernauang dalam kehidupan sehari – hari . Memilih perumahan sesuai dengan kebutuhan bukanlah hal yang mudah, apalagi di Desa Air Santok terdapat beberapa komplek perumahan yang sangat diminati para konsumen. Semakin meningkatnya pertumbuhan penduduk membuat semakin meningkatnya kebutuhan tempat tinggal. Desa Air Santok mengalami pertumbuhan penduduk setiap tahunnya, hal ini disebabkan terdapatnya perumahan di Desa Air Santok. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian kuantitatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan kuesioner dan observasi lapangan. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui faktor pemilihan perumahan di Desa Air Santok Kecamatan Pariaman Timur Kota Pariaman sebagai tempat tinggal (studi kasus perumahan Villa Mutiara resident II dan perumahan Tata Bhakri IV). Faktor pemilihan perumahan ditinjau dari faktor utama yang terdiri dari harga, dekat tempat kerja dan jauh dari potensi ancaman bencana alam sedangkan faktor pendukung yaitu dekat ke rumah orang tua, lingkungan perumahan dan keamanan lingkungan. Hasil akhir penelitian berupa faktor utama pemilihan perumahan Villa Mutiara resident II dan perumahan Tata Bhakri IV adalah jauh dari potensi anacaman bencana alam. Faktor pendukung pemilihan perumahanVilla Mutiara resident II adalah lingkungan perumahan, sedangkan perumahan Tata Bhakri IV adalah dekat rumah orang tua.
 Kata Kunci : Analisis, lingkungan penelitian, faktor pemilihan perumahan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.539
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4610.286

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJURNAL BUANASame topicCoastal Management and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207