MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242326363 · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv.10287534

Electrochemical Biomass Valorization on Gold-Metal Oxide Nanoscale Heterojunctions Enables Investigation of both Catalyst and Reaction Dynamics with Operando Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy

2019· preprint· en· W4242326363 on OpenAlexaff
Nina Heidary, Nikolay Kornienko

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCatalysisElectrochemistryFaraday efficiencyRaman spectroscopyChemical engineeringOxideContext (archaeology)ChemistryRedoxMetalAmorphous solidAdsorptionMaterials scienceInorganic chemistryElectrodePhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>The electrochemical oxidation of biomass platforms such as 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) to value-added chemicals is an emerging clean technology. However, mechanistic knowledge of this reaction in an electrochemical context is still lacking and <i>operando</i> studies are even more rare. In this work, we utilize core-shell gold-metal oxide nanostructures which enable<i> operando</i> surface-enhanced Raman spectroelectrochemical studies to simultaneously visualize catalyst material transformation and surface reaction intermediates under an applied voltage. As a case study, we show how the transformation of NiOOH from ~1-2 nm amorphous Ni layers facilitates the onset of HMF oxidation to 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid (FDCA), which is attained with near 100% Faradaic efficiency in 1M KOH. In contrast to the case in 1M KOH, NiOOH formation is suppressed, and consequently HMF oxidation is sluggish 10 mM KOH, even at high potentials. <i>Operando </i>Raman experiments elucidate how surface adsorption and interaction dictates product selectivity and how the surface intermediates evolve with applied potential. We further extend our methodology to investigate NiFe, Co, Fe, and CoFe catalysts and demonstrate that high water oxidation activity is not necessarily correlated with excellent HMF oxidation performance and highlight catalytic factors important for this reaction such as reactant-surface interactions and catalysts’ physical and electronic structure. </p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemRxivSame topicElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFrench-language works237,207