MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242343205 · doi:10.15173/esr.v9i1.410

Notebook

2000· article· en· W4242343205 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Gawdat Bahgat, Mohammed A. Alsahlawi, John H. Walsh

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Studies Review · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGlobal Energy Security and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKing Fahd University of Petroleum and MineralsUniversity of Sussex
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Notebook provides data not easilyfound elsewhere, background descriptions ofimportant aspects ofthe energy system and reports on new developments.Contribution are invited.For several decades oil has been the main source of energy worldwide.Since the mid 1970s, oil suppliesfrom the Persian Gulf have been in competition with other sources.This paper argues that at the beginning of the new millennium the Persian Gulfstates will assert their dominant role in the world oil market.The study analyzes the current and potential suppliers such as the North Sea and the Caspian Sea Basin.The growing demand in Asia, particularly in China, is discussed.Finally, the conclusion highlights the security dilemma ofoil supplies from the Persian Gulf Depuis des decennies, Ie petrole est fa SOurce principale d'energie dans Ie monde.A partir du milieu des annees 70, l'approvisonnement en petrole provenant du Golfe persique est en concurrence avec d'autres sources d'approvisionnement.eet article soutient qu 'en ce debut du millenaire, les Etats du Golfe persique affirmeront leur preponderance sur Ie marche mondial.L'etude analyse les fournisseurs actuels et luturs, entre Qutres ceux provenant de la mer du Nord et du bassin de fa mer Caspienne.On discute de fa demande croissante provenant de l'Asie, particulierement de fa Chine.En conclusion, nous attirons l'attention sur les problemes de securite concernant flapprovisionnement en provenance du Golfe persique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.927
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy Studies ReviewSame topicGlobal Energy Security and PolicyFrench-language works237,207