MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242343925 · doi:10.5935/978-85-7042-132-6

Gestão do Conhecimento e Inovação Volume 9

2019· book· pt· W4242343925 on OpenAlexaff
Bekembauer Procópio Rocha, Gláucio José Couri Machado, Kleber de Oliveira Santos, Rosa Leila Lima do Nascimento, Rodrigo Mesquita de Jesus, Ana Eleonora Almeida Paixão, Ismael Cristofer Baierle, Jones Luís Schaefer, João Victor Kothe, Leandro Pinto Fava, Elpídio Oscar Benitez Nara, João Carlos Furtado, Flávia Luiza Araújo Tavares da Silva, Patrícia Beltrão Lessa Constant, João Antônio Belmino dos Santos, Bruno Ramos Eloy, Daniel Barreto Dória Amado, Jadson Andrade Costa, Alair Helena Ferreira, João Luiz Bernardes Júnior, José Aprígio Carneiro Neto, Lúcio da Silva Gama Júnior, Luiz Felipe Costa Silva Carneiro, Felipe César da Silva Nunes, Marcus Vinicius Ribeiro Cruz, Tatiana Souto Maior de Oliveira, Alexandre Rodizio Bento, Alonso Pérez-Soltero, Juan Pablo Becerril-Sitten, Gerardo Sanchez‐Schmitz, Mario Barceló-Valenzuela, João Samarone Alves de Lima, João Almeida e Silva, Armando Pereira Grell, Chennyfer Dobbins Abi Rached, Valdecir da Silva, Paulo César Ribeiro Quintairos, Fernando Augusto Almeida Neves, Paulo Soares Figueiredo, Mônica Holanda Santos, Daniel Batista de Almeida, Túlio Sérgio de Almeida, Jorge Muniz, Maria Naires Alves de Souza, André Jalles Monteiro, Vinícius Tolentino Oliveira e Silva, Roberto Patrus, Maria das Graças Junqueira Machado Tomazela, Fernando Celso de Campos, Luiz Antônio Daniel, Sônia Regina Lamego Lino, Amélia Silveira, Leandro Petarnella

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languagept
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicBusiness and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsLockheed Martin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVolume (thermodynamics)BusinessPhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

soluções de convergência tecnológica e o lead time organizacional ............

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.168
Threshold uncertainty score0.561

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1680.065

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same topicBusiness and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207