Bibliographic record
Abstract
Giulia Cantarutti (Hrsg.): Scrittori a Berlino nel novecento Bologna: Pàtron Editore, 2000, 216 Seiten. ( Elena Agazzi ) Thomas Bodenmüller: Literaturtransfer in der Frühen Neuzeit Francisco López de Úbedas “La pícara Justina” und ihre italienische und englische Bearbeitung von Barezzo Barezzi und Captain John Stevens Communicatio, Bd. 25 Tübingen: Niemeyer, 2001, 412 Seiten. ( Felice Balletta ) Linda Simonis: Die Kunst des Geheimen Esoterische Kommunikation und ästhetische Darstellung im 18. Jahrhundert Beiträge zur neueren Literaturgeschichte, Bd. 185 Heidelberg: Winter, 2002, 456 Seiten. ( Christoph Deupmann ) Robert Dion, Frances Fortier, Élisabeth Haghebaert (Hrsg.): Enjeux des genres dans les écritures contemporaines Québec: Nota bene, 2001, 365 Seiten. ( Klaus-Dieter Ertler ) Eva Lezzi, Zerstörte Kindheit Literarische Autobiographien zur Shoah Literatur und Leben, Bd. 57 Köln, Weimar, Wien: Böhlau, 2001, 382 Seiten. ( Carola Hilmes ) Stephen Greenblatt: Hamlet in Purgatory Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2001, 322 Seiten. ( Ulrich Kinzel ) Carola Hilmes: Das inventarische und das inventorische Ich Grenzfälle des Autobiographischen Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. Winter, 2000, 446 Seiten. ( Eva Lezzi ) Erika Fischer-Lichte (Hrsg.): Theatralität und die Krisen der Repräsentation . Germanistische Symposien. Berichtsbände, Bd. XXII Stuttgart, Weimar: J. B. Metzler, 2001, VII + 620 Seiten. ( Dirk Niefanger ) Österreichische Literatur im Exil seit 1933 www.literaturepochen.at/exil Projektleitung: Primus-Heinz Kucher, Karl Müller Salzburg 2002. ( Tobias Schneider ) Aglaia Blioumi: Interkulturalität als Dynamik Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag, 2001, 276 Seiten. ( Elke Sturm-Trigonakis )
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.303 | 0.219 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".