Allelopathic potential of <i>Verbesina encelioides</i> root leachate in soil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Verbesina encelioides (Cav.) Benth. & Hook. F. ex. A. Gray (Asteraceae) is a perennial weed that interferes with the growth and establishment of crop species in semiarid regions of India. The present research was designed to understand the probable involvement of allelopathy in its interference mechanism. We studied the effect of soils amended with different dilutions of V. encelioides root leachate (full strength and 1:2 and 1:4 (v/v) ratios of root leachate to water) on the growth of radish seedlings (Raphanus sativus L.). Soils that were not amended were used as controls. We also investigated the influence of different levels of N fertilization (1, 5, and 10 mM) on the modification of the allelopathic potential of amended soils, in terms of their effect on soil total phenolics and radish seedling growth. The addition of both full strength and 1:2 dilution of V. encelioides root leachate resulted in significant (P < 0.05) suppression of root (-25.7 and -17.2%, respectively) and shoot (-21.3 and -13.8%, respectively) growth of radish seedlings. The total level of phenolics in soil amended with full-strength (8.53 ± 0.55 µg/g), 1:2 dilution (5.43 ± 0.4 µg/g), and 1:4 dilution (4.17 ± 0.36 µg/g) was significantly (P < 0.05) higher compared with that of control (2.98 ± 0.47 µg/g) soil. Although the different amounts of N fertilization in soil amended with V. encelioides root leachate could not counteract the probable allelopathic interference, we observed an increase in root growth of radish seedlings in soil amended with 10 mM N fertilization plus either a 1:2 dilution (+21.2%) or a 1:4 dilution (+36.5%) of root leachate. No significant differences in NO 3 - and NH 4 + concentration were observed between control soil and soil amended with different amounts of root leachate and N fertlization. Since allelopathic activities include both inhibitory and stimulatory growth responses, the radish seedling growth responses to V. encelioides root leachate can be explained by allelopathy. High performance liquid chromatography data indicate qualitative and quantitative differences in phenolic peaks of both control and amended soil. Our research demonstrates the allelopathic potential of V. encelioides roots and the probable involvement of allelopathy in its interference success.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".