MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242477393 · doi:10.4095/219876

Left- and Right-Looking RADARSAT-2 Data for Mosaics of Ancient Supercontinents

2002· report· en· W4242477393 on OpenAlexaff
E Gauthier, P Budkewitsch, M D'Iorio, Fernando Pellon de Miranda

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGeomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyGeologyRemote sensing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Pangaea supercontinent began its break-up some 200 Ma ago, during which time the ancient cratons of West Africa and San Francisco-Congo of Gondwana were rifted apart. These older parts of the continental crust now reside in the African and South American Shields, but share a common geological past. Geological maps of reconstructed Pangaea aid geologists to understand the tectonic history of the evolving Earth, the global distribution of rock units and ore deposits. It follows that radar and other remotely sensed images of Earth can be mosaicked in the same fashion to provide supplementary information in support of such investigation. In our radar mosaic for part of Gondwana, left-looking RADARSAT-1 data of west Africa acquired on ascending passes during the Antarctic Mapping Mission and normal mode (right-looking) data of South America from descending passes were first seamed together separately. The two continental image maps were then rotated into their pre-break-up configuration to create a radar mosaic with a relatively consistent westward radar look. This critical aspect of the mosaic would not be possible from a SAR system without left- and right-looking capability. A consistent look direction is of great importance when landform interpretations are made. The left and right pointing of the RADARSAT-2 antenna will enable routine data collection of this kind for similar studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeomagnetism and Paleomagnetism StudiesFrench-language works237,207