MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242478067 · doi:10.1306/13201167m892598

Characterization of a Sediment Core from Potential Gas-hydrate-bearing Reservoirs in the Sagavanirktok, Prince Creek, and Schrader Bluff Formations of Alaska's North Slope

2009· book-chapter· en· W4242478067 on OpenAlexaff
Richard Sigal, Chandra Rai, Carl Sondergeld, Bryan M. Spears, W. J. Ebanks, W. D. Zogg, N. Emery, G. McCardle, R. Schweizer, W. G. McLeod, J. Van Eerde

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Association of Petroleum Geologists eBooks · 2009
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsAlberta Oil Sands Technology and Research Authority
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMemoirClathrate hydrateGeologyArchaeologyEarth scienceHistoryHydrateArt historyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In the Anadarko Hot Ice 1 well, a continuous core was acquired from 107 ft (33 m) subsurface to 2300 ft (701 m). The Hot Ice 1 well cored through the Tertiary-age sediments of the Sagavanirktok Formation, the Tertiary and upper Cretaceous Prince Creek Formation (which includes the informally named Ugnu sandstones), and Schrader Bluff Formation (which includes the informally named West Sak sandstones); the core ended in 42 ft (13 m) of what appears to be a marine section of fine-grained sediment. The recovered core was described as 37% unconsolidated sandstone. The Ugnu sandstones and shallower section cored during phase I of the project were 44% sandstone, and the West Sak sandstones and deeper zones cored during phase II of the project were 26% sand. These zones represent the primary potential reservoir rock in this area. Core plugs for analysis were removed from all the identified sand zones. Porosity, permeability, grain density, and bulk modulus were obtained for the unconsolidated sands at 57 depths during phase I and 47during phase II. Porosity and permeability were measured at 800, 1200, and 1800 psi (5.5, 8.3, 12.4 MPa) confining stress. The phase I recovered sands had an average porosity at 800 psi (5.5 MPa) confining pressure of 39.3%. At 1800 psi (12.4 MPa), this average had decreased to 37.3%. The Ugnu sandstones exhibited very high permeability. Several samples were close to 20 d. The geometrical mean of the permeability at 800 psi (5.5 MPa) confining pressure was 3.72 d. At 1800 psi (12.4 MPa), it had been reduced to 3.15 d. No discernable correlation between porosity and permeability was observed. The average grain density was 2.64 g/cm 3. The bulk modulus ranged from about 20,000 to 60,000 psi (138 to 414 MPa). The phase II recovered sands were slightly less porous on the average. At 800 psi (5.5 MPa) confining pressure, the average porosity was 37.2%. This was reduced to 35.4% at 1800 psi (12.4 MPa). The phase II recovered sands were considerably lower in permeability than the phase I recovered sands. At 800 psi (5.5 MPa) confining pressure, its geometric mean permeability was 0.633d. This was reduced to 0.486 d at 1800 psi (12.4 MPa). A good correlation between porosity and permeability was observed. The average grain density for the phase II recovered sands was 2.70g/cm 3. The bulk modulus ranged from 20,000 to 100,000 psi (138 to 690 MPa). Five anomalous thin hard cemented sand zones were observed in the phase II recovered core. Three of the zones were sampled. Two of the sampled zones had porosity in the 1to2%range and permeability in the microdarcy range. Porosities in a third zone were in the 10 to 20% range and permeability in the microdarcy to tens of microdarcys range. With one exception, the bulk moduli in these anomalous hard zones were an order of magnitude larger than the unconsolidated sands. The grain densities were similar to the West Sak unconsolidated sandstones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.190
Threshold uncertainty score0.926

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Association of Petroleum Geologists eBooksSame topicMethane Hydrates and Related PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207