Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract AFRICANIST LIBRARIANSHIP IN AN ERA OF CHANGE. Evalds, Vicki, and David Henige (Eds.). Lanham, MD: Scarecrow, 2005, 242 pp., $35.00, ISBN 0-8108-5201-2. Reviewed by Robin Kear. BEST TECHNOLOGY PRACTICES IN HIGHER EDUCATION. Lloyd, Les (Ed.). Medford, NJ: Information Today, 2005, xxi+ 242 pp., $39.50, ISBN 1-57387-208-3. Reviewed by Brad Eden DESIGN AND USABILITY OF DIGITAL LIBRARIES: CASE STUDIES IN THE ASIA PACIFIC. Theng, Yin-Leng, and Schubert Foo (Eds.). Hershey, PA: Idea Group, 2005, xiv+ 395 pp., $69.95, ISBN 1-59140-442-8. Reviewed by Sherri Vokey. GUIDE TO LICENSING AND ACQUIRING ELECTRONIC INFORMATION. (ALCTS ACQUISITIONS GUIDES; 13). Bosch, Stephen, Patricia A. Promis, and Chris Sugnet, with contributions by Trisha Davis. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow, 2005, v+112 pp., $40.00, ISBN 0-8108-5259-4. Reviewed by Brad Eden. LAST ONE OUT TURN OFF THE LIGHTS: IS THIS THE FUTURE OF AMERICAN AND CANADIAN LIBRARIES? Cleyle, Susan E., and Louise M. McGillis (Eds.). Toronto: Scarecrow, 2005, xix+ 227 pp., $54.00, ISBN 081085192X. Reviewed by James Watson. THE SKEPTICAL BUSINESS SEARCHER: THE INFORMATION ADVISOR'S GUIDE TO EVALUATING WEB DATA, SITES, AND SOURCES. Beckman, Robert. Medford, NJ: Information Today, 2004, 281 pp., $29.95, ISBN 0-9109-6566-8. Reviewed by Laura L. Moody. TECHNOLOGY PLANNING. Matthews, Joseph R. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited, 2004, xvi+ 139 pp., $45.00, ISBN 1-59158-190-7. Reviewed by Beatrice R. Pulliam.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.015 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it