MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242781192 · doi:10.1017/ccol9780521833479.011

Sacred music

2005· book-chapter· en· W4242781192 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2005
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Influence and Diplomacy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiturgyRiteContext (archaeology)ArtWorshipHistoryStyle (visual arts)MusicalLiteratureAsidePhilosophyTheologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

That music survives from the past with the inevitable loss of its original context is a truism that might be challenged above all by sacred music, on the grounds that a liturgy provides a timeless context within which music composed for its service can continue to fulfill its original purpose. Indeed, the Catholic liturgy that emerged from the Counter-Reformation after the Council of Trent (1545–63) – the Tridentine Rite, a normative form of late medieval Roman Use – persisted until the reforms of the Second Vatican Council (1962–65), providing for four centuries a constant framework of worship (local variations and emphases of practice aside) for which music could long remain in use. As many a set of manuscript parts from the repertories of religious establishments in the former Habsburg lands of central and eastern Europe attests, Haydn's sacred music continued to be performed within the Catholic liturgy throughout the nineteenth century, a tradition often reflected in the nature of the performing material (a core of original eighteenth-century parts, supplemented by various accretions) and the recording of dates of performance on the reverse of the organ part or folder. Yet today Haydn's sacred music is seen to have suffered a loss of context more far-reaching than that undergone by some other genres of his output. The late masses for instance – works large enough to form independent musical entities – are performed as concert pieces, crossing boundaries of genre, style, and purpose between “church” and “chamber” more fundamental than the contextual changes affecting, say, the string quartets and symphonies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.842
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it