Bibliographic record
Abstract
That music survives from the past with the inevitable loss of its original context is a truism that might be challenged above all by sacred music, on the grounds that a liturgy provides a timeless context within which music composed for its service can continue to fulfill its original purpose. Indeed, the Catholic liturgy that emerged from the Counter-Reformation after the Council of Trent (1545–63) – the Tridentine Rite, a normative form of late medieval Roman Use – persisted until the reforms of the Second Vatican Council (1962–65), providing for four centuries a constant framework of worship (local variations and emphases of practice aside) for which music could long remain in use. As many a set of manuscript parts from the repertories of religious establishments in the former Habsburg lands of central and eastern Europe attests, Haydn's sacred music continued to be performed within the Catholic liturgy throughout the nineteenth century, a tradition often reflected in the nature of the performing material (a core of original eighteenth-century parts, supplemented by various accretions) and the recording of dates of performance on the reverse of the organ part or folder. Yet today Haydn's sacred music is seen to have suffered a loss of context more far-reaching than that undergone by some other genres of his output. The late masses for instance – works large enough to form independent musical entities – are performed as concert pieces, crossing boundaries of genre, style, and purpose between “church” and “chamber” more fundamental than the contextual changes affecting, say, the string quartets and symphonies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.071 | 0.020 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".