MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Comparative effects of zilpaterol hydrochloride and ractopamine hydrochloride on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and longissimus tenderness of feedlot steers fed barley-based diets

2014· article· en· W4242792564 on OpenAlex
J. Van Donkersgoed, J. Berg, G. Royan, J. P. Hutcheson, M. Brown

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Professional Animal Scientist · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPharmacological Effects and Assays
Canadian institutionsTransCanada (Canada)Alberta Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTendernessFeedlotAnimal scienceRactopamineChemistryMarbled meatIntramuscular fatBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A randomized complete block design experiment was conducted with 4,114 beef steers in a commercial feedlot in western Canada that were fed barley-based diets to evaluate the effects of ractopamine hydrochloride (Optaflexx) and zilpaterol hydrochloride (Zilmax) on health, performance, carcass traits, and LM tenderness. Treatments consisted of feeding ractopamine hydrochloride at 30 mg/kg (100% DM basis) for 32 d at the end of the feeding period or zilpaterol hydrochloride at 8.3 mg/kg (100% DM basis) for 20 d at the end of the feeding period, followed by the required minimum 4-d meat withdrawal period before slaughter (range 6 to 10 d). No differences (P > 0.05) were detected in mortality, number of railers (animals shipped to slaughter before the rest of their pen), ADG, G:F, or DMI between steers fed zilpaterol hydrochloride or ractopamine hydrochloride. Steers fed zilpaterol hydrochloride had heavier HCW (8.4 kg, P < 0.0001), greater percentage of overweight carcasses (2.1 percentage units, P = 0.006), greater DP (1.0 percentage unit, P = 0.0001), greater percentage of YG 1 carcasses (7.0 percentage units, P = 0.01), lower percentage of YG 3 carcasses (4.8 percentage units, P = 0.02), lower percentage of prime carcasses (0.32 percentage units, P = 0.05), and a lower percentage of Canadian AAA carcasses (5.6 percentage units, P = 0.04) compared with steers fed ractopamine hydrochloride. No differences in LM tenderness (P > 0.05) were detected between steers fed zilpaterol hydrochloride or ractopamine hydrochloride. Based on the marketing grid on which these feedlot steers were sold, the additional economic value of zilpaterol hydrochloride at 8.3 mg/kg to ractopamine hydrochloride at 30 mg/kg was $30.36 (Canadian) per steer. Feeding zilpaterol hydrochloride for 20 d to finishing steers resulted in leaner carcasses and greater carcass weight without compromising tenderness compared with feeding ractopamine hydrochloride at 30 mg/kg.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.803
Threshold uncertainty score0.311

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it