MétaCan
Menu
← all works

Power system protection

2021· preprint· en· 501 citations· W4242867252 on OpenAlex· 10.32920/ryerson.14668368.v1

Why is this work in the frame?

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

Canadian affiliationAn author listed a Canadian institution. This is the only route the usual frame has.

Full frame distilled prediction

Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

Candidate categories
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categories
none
Domain
Candidate signal: noneConsensus signal: none
Study design
Candidate signal: Simulation or modelingConsensus signal: Simulation or modeling
Genre
Candidate signal: EmpiricalConsensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score
0.910
Threshold uncertainty score
1.000
Validation status
machine_predicted_unvalidated · codex-gemma-dda1882f352a

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread
0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Abstract

This report provides review of importance of power system protection and presents different techniques available in practical situations. The material provided in this report is available online on different resources. Moreover, this report examines different types of faults in power system and discusses the consequences of the faults. Moreover, it also talks about different methods of protection schemes applied for various faults occurred on power system equipment such as transformer, generator, bus, transmission and distribution lines and motors. Furthermore, different relaying techniques are also discussed briefly which are used extensively throughout the report for explaining the importance of these techniques in fault detection and damage prevention. SKM power tool is used for simulation purpose. The simulation result are displayed and explained. Moreover, short circuit calculation and equipment selection method is also discussed in this report.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

The record

Venue
Topic
Power Systems Fault Detection
Field
Engineering
Canadian institutions
Toronto Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of Waterloo
Funders
not available
Keywords
Reliability engineeringElectric power systemElectric power transmissionTransformerPower transmissionComputer sciencePower-system protectionGenerator (circuit theory)EngineeringFault (geology)Power (physics)Control engineeringElectrical engineeringVoltage
Has abstract in OpenAlex
yes