MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Dietary Cognitive Restraint

2004· article· en· W4242896676 on OpenAlexaff
Rayisa Hontscharuk, Emma O’Donnell, Nancy I. Williams, Tanya Burke, Mary Jane De Souza

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, Safety, and Science Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLeptinAthletesInternal medicineFollicular phaseMenarcheTriiodothyronineMenstrual cycleEndocrinologyHormonePhysiologyObesityPhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

0219 Dietary cognitive restraint (CR) describes a conscious limitation of food intake in an effort to control body weight. Higher levels of CR have been reported in exercising women with exercise-associated menstrual disturbances (EAMD) when compared to levels in eumenorrheic (EU) active women. PURPOSE: To determine if dietary CR also serves as a marker for altered energy homeostasis in EAMD, since EAMD is also linked to physiological energy conserving adaptations. METHODS: Athletic women of varying activity levels (n = 38) completed the three factor eating questionnaire and the EDI2, and blood samples were obtained during the early follicular phase (days 2–6) of two consecutive menstrual cycles in EU athletes or day 1 of two consecutive 30-day periods in oligo/amenorrheic (O/Amen) athletes. Blood samples for each cycle were assayed for total triiodothyronine (TT3), insulin and leptin and levels for each cycle averaged for each subject. RESULTS: In this study, 18 athletes exhibited high CR (above the cut-off for normal, i.e. > 10), as defined in the original questionnaire, and 20 athletes demonstrated CR scores in the normal range. These groups were similar (p>0.05) with respect to age (24.6±0.8 yrs), height (164.2±9.5 cm), weight (57.3±1.1 kg), percent body fat (22.9±1.0), age of menarche (12.6±0.2 yrs) and VO2 max (44.2±0.9 ml/kg/min). The athletes with high CR (n = 18) had a higher (p<0.001) mean score of 14.3±0.7 compared to the non-CR group (n = 20) who had a mean score of 4.8±0.5. The high CR group also had a higher (p = 0.035) score on the EDI-2 subscale of drive for thinness than the non-CR group, 5.0±1.2 and 1.9±0.8, respectively. TT3 levels were lower (p = 0.023) in the high CR group (1.4±0.08 nmol/L) compared to the non-CR group (1.6±0.08 nmol/L). Insulin levels were lower (p = 0.048) in the high CR group (27.78±2.1 pmol/L) compared to the non-CR group (38.9±4.2 pmol/L). Leptin levels were similar (4.8±1.1 ng/ml, p = 0.28), likely due to similar fat mass (12.7±0.7 g) between the groups. Among the high CR group, 50% had either O/Amen (n = 9/18), whereas, among the non-CR group, 25% had either O/Amen (n = 5/20), demonstrating that high CR was dependent on menstrual status (χ2 = 9.9, p = 0.042). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that high CR is associated with markers of altered energy homeostasis indicating low energy availability, including TT3 and insulin, previously demonstrated to be low in athletic women with EAMD and that menstrual status was associated with high CR. Funded by Arthur Thornton Cardiopulmonary Fund.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.217

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0650.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicEducation, Safety, and Science StudiesFrench-language works237,207