Periodicity in Structure, Bonding, and Reactivity for P-Block Complexes of a Geometry-Constraining Triamide Ligand
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The use of pincer ligands to access non-VSEPR geometries at main-group centers is an emerging strategy for eliciting new stoichiometric and catalytic reactivity. As part of this effort, several different tridentate trianionic substituents have to date been employed at a range of different central elements, providing a patchwork dataset that precludes rigorous structure-function correlation. Here we report an analysis of periodic trends in structure (solid, solution, and gas phase), bonding, and reactivity based on systematic variation of the central element (P, As, Sb, or Bi) with retention of a single tridentate triamide substituent. In this homologous series, the central element can adopt either a bent or planar geometry. The tendency to adopt planar geometries increases descending the group with the phosphorus triamide (<b>1</b>) and its arsenic congener (<b>2</b>) exhibiting bent conformations, and the antimony (<b>3</b>) and bismuth (<b>4</b>) analogues exhibiting a predominantly planar structure in solution. This trend has been rationalized using the energy decomposition analysis. A rare phase-dependent dynamic covalent dimerization was observed for <b>3</b> and the associated thermodynamic parameters were established quantitatively. Planar geometries were found to engender lower LUMO energies and smaller band gaps as compared to bent ones, resulting in different reactivity patterns. These results provide a benchmark dataset to guide further research in this rapidly emerging area.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".