MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Relative Age Effect in Masters Sports: Replication and Extension

2009· article· en· W4243006894 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nikola Medic, Janet L. Starkes, Patricia L. Weir, Bradley W. Young, Bob Grove

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSports Performance and Training
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReplication (statistics)Extension (predicate logic)PsychologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationMedicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Method Data Collection On receiving approval from die institutional review board, data were collected from archived records on die official Internet site for die 2005 World Masters Games, held in Edmonton, Canada (World Masters Games, 2005) . Because participation entry lists were unavailable, we extracted data from official results by manually eliminating each participant whose name appeared more man once.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.078
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.121
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Reproducibility · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.922
Threshold uncertainty score0.411

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0780.121
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.006
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
DomainReproducibility
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Quarterly for Exercise and SportSame topicSports Performance and TrainingFrench-language works237,207