MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mapping patterns of nodal metastases in seminoma: Rethinking radiotherapy fields.

2012· article· en· W4243066995 on OpenAlexaff
Jonathan J. Paly, Jason A. Efstathiou, Sandeep Hedgire, Peter Chung, Martin O’Malley, Anand Shah, Justin E. Bekelman, Mukesh G. Harisinghani, Anthony L. Zietman, William U. Shipley, Clair J. Beard

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTesticular diseases and treatments
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSeminomaHilum (anatomy)AnatomyRenal hilumLymph nodePelvisRadiation therapyRadiologyNephrectomySurgeryPathologyKidneyInternal medicineChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

324 Background: Historically, radiation therapy for testicular seminoma has targeted the retroperitoneal (RPLN) and pelvic lymph nodes via standard anterior-posterior/posterior-anterior fields based upon skeletal anatomy. This study was undertaken to identify the location of involved lymph nodes and their relationship to both bony and vascular anatomy in stage II patients. Methods: Scans of 69 patients with stage II seminoma diagnosed between 1996 and 2011 were reviewed. 55% of patients had left-sided, 44% right-sided, and 1% bilateral primaries. The position of each node was recorded and then transferred to a standardized CT template scan based upon its relation to skeletal and vascular anatomy. Para-aortic fields were overlaid on the template, extending from T10/T11 to L5/S1 and bounded laterally by the contralateral transverse processes and ipsilateral renal hilum. Extended fields included ipsilateral iliac lymph node chains. The location of involved nodes within these conventional fields was assessed. Results: 113 nodes were identified as radiographically positive. 88% of involved nodes were located in the RPLN region with the remaining 12% in the pelvis. 98% of positive RPLN nodes were within a 2.2cm lateral and 1.8cm anterior expansion of the aorta between L1/L2 and L5/S1. No positive nodes were identified within the renal hilar region or superior to L1 for patients with left-sided seminomas. For right-sided seminomas, no positive nodes were superior to L2, though there was one renal hilar node. <2% of all nodes fell outside the extended treatment field. Conclusions: Nodal metastases from a contemporary cohort of stage II seminoma patients generally localized to a smaller area than is targeted using conventional fields. Notably, no positive nodes were identified superior to L1, on the contralateral side of vertebral bodies, or in the left renal hilum. Modified treatment fields based on vascular rather than bony anatomy may allow for a significant decrease in normal tissue irradiation and its associated toxicities. Validation of these results may inform guidelines for a redefined clinical target volume and allow for more targeted radiation delivery in the treatment of seminoma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.145
GPT teacher head0.466
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicTesticular diseases and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207