MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4243174869 · doi:10.1515/9783839438053-023

Home, Hotel, Hospital, Hospice

2017· book-chapter· en· W4243174869 on OpenAlexafffundabout
James Struthers

Bibliographic record

Venuetranscript Verlag eBooks · 2017
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Aging, and Tourism Studies
Canadian institutionsCARE Canada
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaYork University
KeywordsBusinessHospice careNursingMedicinePalliative care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A client's 'home' is wherever that person resides.It can be a private residence, supportive housing, retirement home, or just about anywhere except a hospital."OnTariO, Bringing 1 "It's been quite disturbing for us because everything here is set-up to create a home-like environment but a large number of our residents are admitted on the verge of palliative We're not really set up for a palliative population."inTerview wiTh care hOme sPiriTual healTh manager, 2014 1Few institutions have been surrounded by as much confusion, such gendered contradictions, and so many cultural anxieties as care homes for older adults, which bear the weight of cultural and economic uncertainties around population aging, changing perceptions of frailty and family ties, the meaning of dependence and independence, and fears of mortality.As one former care aide observes, "finding no one to blame for old age, why not blame those who house it?"(Tisdale xii).In their recent study Residential Care Transformed: Revisiting the Last Refuge, British gerontologists Julia Johnson, Sheena Rolph, and Randall Smith agree that "what people fear most is not residential care per se but ageing and the challenges of deep old age" (216).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.178
Threshold uncertainty score0.594

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1780.068

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuetranscript Verlag eBooksSame topicMigration, Aging, and Tourism StudiesFrench-language works237,207