MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4243177721 · doi:10.1167/13.9.844

Gaze-oriented Attention in fearful and happy facial expressions varies with autistic traits

2013· article· en· W4243177721 on OpenAlexaff
Amandine Lassalle, Roxane J. Itier

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vision · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFace Recognition and Perception
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGazePsychologyAutistic traitsHappinessFacial expressionAutismPopulationCognitive psychologyEmotional expressionDevelopmental psychologyAutism spectrum disorderSocial psychologyCommunication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gaze is an important social signal used to determine others’ intentions. Previous gaze-cuing studies have shown faster responses to gazed-at targets than to non-gazed-at targets. This gaze orienting effect (GOE) reflects the spontaneous orientation of attention toward gaze direction, and is negatively correlated with the autism quotient (AQ) score indexing autistic traits in the general population. Thus, in accordance with clinical observations of autistic individuals, participants with many autistic traits seem to show a weaker gaze following than those with little autistic traits. Recent studies have also shown that attention orienting by gaze is modulated by the expression of the face cue. It remains unknown, however, whether this emotional effect varies as a function of autistic traits. The present ERP study investigated whether autistic traits impact the modulation of the GOE by fearful and happy emotions. Two groups were tested, one group with low AQ scores (<18, less autistic traits) and the other with high AQ scores (>26, more autistic traits). Stimuli consisted of centrally presented neutral faces dynamically averting their gaze to the side before expressing fear or happiness. Participants localized the subsequently presented target as fast as possible while maintaining their gaze centered. The GOE was modulated by emotions only in the high AQ group due to a decreased GOE for happy compared to fearful faces. While responses to fearful faces were similar in both groups, the GOE for happy faces was smaller in individuals with high compared to low AQ. In addition, ERP amplitudes to the target (P1 component) showed a gaze congruency effect in the low but not in the high AQ group indicating group differences in the neural processes involved in gaze-oriented attention. The results suggest a diminished sensitivity to social signals such as happy faces and gaze in individuals with many autistic traits. Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2013

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Vision→Same topicFace Recognition and Perception→French-language works237,207→