MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4243221154 · doi:10.5489/cuaj.692

Commercial renal transplantation: A risky venture? A single Canadian centre experience

2013· article· en· W4243221154 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Anil Kapoor, Kevin Kwan, J. Paul Whelan

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Urological Association Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrgan Donation and Transplantation
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTransplantationHemodialysisSurgeryKidney transplantationRenal replacement therapyDonation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Canada, akin to other developed nations, faces thegrowing challenges of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Even withexpanded donor criteria for renal transplantation (the treatment ofchoice for ESRD), the supply of kidneys is outpaced by the escalatingdemand. Remuneration for kidney donation is proscribedin Canada. Without an option of living-related transplantation(biological or emotional donors), patients often struggle with longwaiting lists for deceased donor transplantation. Accordingly, manypatients are now opting for more expedient avenues to obtaininga renal transplant. Through commercial organ retrieval programs,from living and deceased donors, patients are travelling outsideCanada to have the procedure performed.Methods: Between September 2001 and July 2007, 10 patients (7males, 3 females) underwent commercial renal transplantation outsideCanada. We describe the clinical outcomes of these patientsmanaged postoperatively at our single Canadian transplant centre.Results: Six living unrelated and 4 deceased donor renal transplantationswere performed on these 10 patients (mean age49.5 years). All procedures were performed in developing countriesand the postoperative complications were subsequently treatedat our centre. The mean post-transplant serum creatinine was142 mmol/L. The average follow-up time was 29.8 months (range:3 to 73 months). One patient required a transplant nephrectomysecondary to fungemia and subsequently died. One patient had afailed transplant and has currently resumed hemodialysis. Acuterejection was seen in 5 patients with 3 of these patients requiringre-initiation of hemodialysis. Only 1 patient had an uncomplicatedcourse after surgery.Discussion: Despite the kidney trade being a milieu of corruptionand commercialization, and the high risk of unconventionalcomplications, patients returning to Canada after commercial renaltransplantation are the new reality. Patients are often arriving withoutany documentation; therefore, timely, goal-directed therapy forsurgical and infectious complications is frequently delayed becauseof the time taken to establish an accurate diagnosis. Refuting theexistence of commercial renal transplantation may not be a practicalsolution; more consistent communication and documentationwith transplant teams may be more pragmatic. In the current climate,patients considering the option of overseas commercial renaltransplantation should be advised of the potential increased risks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.652
Threshold uncertainty score0.693

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0080.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2013
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Urological Association JournalSame topicOrgan Donation and TransplantationFrench-language works237,207