MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4243319893 · doi:10.1055/s-0037-1606514

Information on IMIA Members

2017· article· en· W4243319893 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueYearbook of Medical Informatics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Peace and Security Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IMIA Member Societies and Corresponding Members Member Societies AMIA (American Medical Informatics Association) Argentine Association of Medical Informatics (AAIM) Association for Health Informatics of Nigeria (AHIN) Association for Medical and Bio-Informatics, Singapore (AMBIS) Association for Medical Informatics of Serbia Belgian Medical Informatics Association Brazilian Society of Health Informatics (SBIS) British Computer Society (BCS Health) Burundi Health Informatics Association Cameroonian Health Informatics Society (CAHIS) Chilean Health Informatics Society China Medical Informatics Association COACH: Canada’s Health Informatics Association Colombian Association for Health Informatics Croatian Society for Medical Informatics Cuban Society of Medical Informatics Czech Society for Biomedical Engineering and Medical Informatics eHealth Association of Pakistan (eHAP) Finnish Social and Health Informatics Association (FinnSHIA) French Medical Informatics Association (AIM) German Association for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology (GMDS) Ghana Health Informatics Association Greek Health Informatics Association Health Informatics New Zealand Health Informatics Society of Australia Ltd. (HISA) Health Informatics Society of Sri Lanka Healthcare Informatics Society of Ireland Hong Kong Society of Medical Informatics Indian Association for Medical Informatics (IAMI) Iranian Medical Informatics Association Ivorian Society of Biosciences and Health Informatics (ISBHI) Japan Association for Medical Informatics John von Neumann Computer Society (Hungary) Kenya Health Informatics Association Korea Society of Medical Informatics (KOSMI) Medical Informatics Association of Malawi (MIAM) Mexican Medical Informatics Association Norwegian Society for Medical Informatics Peruvian Association of Biomedical Informatics Philippine Medical Informatics Society Romanian Society of Medical Informatics Slovenian Medical Informatics Association (SIMIA) Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia and Herzegovina South African Health Informatics Association Spanish Society of Health Informatics Swedish Federation for Medical Informatics (SFMI) Swiss Society for Medical Informatics Taiwan Association for Medical Informatics (TAMI) Thai Medical Informatics Association The Bolivian Medical Informatics and Telemedicine Society (SOBOTIM) The Israeli Association for Medical Informatics (ILAMI) The Mali Society of Biomedical and Health Information (SOMBIS) The Saudi Association for Health Informatics (SAHI) The Ukrainian Association for Computer Medicine (UACM) Togolese Association for Medical Informatics and Telemedicine (ATIM-TELEMED) Turkish Medical Informatics Association (TURKMIA) Uruguayan Society of Health Informatics Venezuelan Association of Computer Science in Health (AVIS) VMBI, Society for Healthcare Informatics (The Netherlands) Working Group Medical Informatics and eHealth of the Austrian Computer Society (OCG) and the Austrian Society for Biomedical Engineering (ÖGBMT) # Corresponding Members Albania, Algeria, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Democratic Republic of Congo, Egypt, El Salvador, Indonesia, Iraq, Jamaica, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Madagascar, Malaysia, Moldova, Nepal, Oman, Qatar, Russian Federation, Sudan, Syria, Tanzania, Trinidad & Tobago, Uganda, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, Zambia, Zimbabwe # Affiliate Members International Federation for Information Processing (IFIP) - www.ifp.org International Federation of Health Information Management Associations (IFHIMA) - www.ifhima.org World Health Organization - www.who.int #

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score0.397

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueYearbook of Medical InformaticsSame topicGlobal Peace and Security DynamicsFrench-language works237,207