MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4243326846 · doi:10.1080/10417940902787939

Predicting Sexual Satisfaction in Interpersonal Relationships

2010· article· en· W4243326846 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSouthern Communication Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicAttachment and Relationship Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman sexualityPsychologyRomanceInterpersonal communicationSexual desireContext (archaeology)Interpersonal relationshipSocial psychologyGender studiesSociologyPsychoanalysisHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two theoretical models hypothesized to predict sexual satisfaction were assessed. The Sexual Knowledge and Influence Model (SKIM), generated from Metts and colleagues' sexual communication research (Cupach & Metts, 1991 Cupach , W. R. , & Metts , S. (1991). Sexuality and communication in close relationships. In K. McKinney & S. Sprecher's (Eds.), Sexuality in close relationships (pp. 93–110). Hillsdale , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar], 1995 Cupach , W. R. , & Metts , S. ( 1995 ). The role of sexual attitude similarity in romantic heterosexual relationships . Personal Relationships , 2 , 287 – 300 .[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]; Metts & Cupach, 1989 Metts , S. , & Cupach , W. R. ( 1989 ). The role of communication in human sexuality . In K. McKinney & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Human sexuality: The societal and interpersonal context (pp. 139 – 161 ). Norwood , NJ : Ablex Publishing Corporation . [Google Scholar]; Metts & Spitzberg, 1996 Metts , S. , & Spitzberg , B. H. ( 1996 ). Sexual communication in interpersonal contexts: A script-based approach . In B. R. Burleson (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 19 (pp. 49 – 91 ). Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage .[Taylor & Francis Online] , [Google Scholar]) and Luft's (1969 Luft , J. ( 1969 ). Of human interaction . Palo Alto , CA : National Press . [Google Scholar]) Johari window, delineates that willingness to communicate and sexual knowledge jointly predict sexual satisfaction. Alternatively, Byers's Interpersonal Exchange Model of Sexual Satisfaction (IEMSS; Byers, 2001 Byers , E. S. ( 2001 ). Evidence for the importance of relationship satisfaction for women's sexual functioning . In E. Kaschak & L. Tiefer's (Eds.), A new view of women's sexual problems (pp. 23 – 26 ). Binghamton , NY : The Haworth Press . [Google Scholar]; Byers & Demmons, 1999 Byers , E. S. , & Demmons , S. ( 1999 ). Sexual satisfaction and sexual self-disclosure within dating relationships . The Journal of Sex Research , 36 , 180 – 189 .[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]; Byers & Wang, 2004 Byers , E. S. , & Wang , A. ( 2004 ). Understanding sexuality in close relationships from the social exchange perspective . In J. H. Harvey , A. Wenzel , & S. Sprecher (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 203 – 234 ). Mahwah , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates . [Google Scholar]; Lawrance & Byers, 1992 Lawrance , K. , & Byers , E. S. ( 1992 ). Development of the interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction in long-term relationships . The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality , 1 , 123 – 127 . [Google Scholar], 1995 Lawrance , K. , & Byers , E. S. ( 1995 ). Sexual satisfaction in long-term heterosexual relationships: The interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction . Personal Relationships , 2 , 267 – 285 .[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) suggests that exchange variables predict sexual satisfaction. Regression analyses demonstrated that these data were consistent with a combined model in which sexual knowledge and sexual exchange variables were successful at predicting individuals' sexual satisfaction levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it