MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4243357750 · doi:10.1037//1064-1297.8.3.387

Alcohol and behavioral control: Impaired response inhibition and flexibility in social drinkers.

2000· article· en· W4243357750 on OpenAlexaff
Craig Easdon, M. Vogel‐Sprott

Bibliographic record

VenueExperimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicBehavioral Health and Interventions
Canadian institutionsBaycrest Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlexibility (engineering)Response inhibitionAlcoholCognitive flexibilityInhibitory controlCognitionPlaceboPsychologyBehavioral inhibitionClinical psychologyAudiologyMedicineNeurosciencePsychiatryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study shows that a moderate dose of alcohol (0.62 g/kg) can impair cognitive processes controlling behavioral inhibition and flexibility (i.e., inhibiting one response and making a different one). Two groups of male social drinkers (n = 8) received alcohol or a placebo and performed two change tasks that required high or low information processing. Results showed that alcohol impaired inhibitory control and response flexibility following a failure to inhibit a first response, and the intensity of impairment did not differ under the two information processing conditions. Response reaction time and accuracy were not affected by alcohol. These findings indicate that alcohol can impair some cognitive aspects of behavioral control before basic motor processes are affected.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.533
Teacher spread0.421 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExperimental and Clinical PsychopharmacologySame topicBehavioral Health and InterventionsFrench-language works237,207