MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4243395749 · doi:10.5194/tc-2018-234

Rapid retreat of permafrost coastline observed with aerial drone photogrammetry

2018· article· en· W4243395749 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Andrew M. Cunliffe, George Tanski, Boris Radosavljevic, William F. Palmer, Torsten Sachs, Hugues Lantuit, Jeffrey T. Kerby, Isla H. Myers‐Smith

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHorizon 2020Natural Environment Research CouncilEuropean CommissionSight Research UKTransport CanadaNational Geographic Society
KeywordsPermafrostShoreContext (archaeology)Coastal erosionDroneArcticClimate changePhysical geographyErosionBaySatellite imageryGeographyGeologyOceanographyArchaeologyGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Permafrost landscapes are changing around the Arctic in response to climate warming, with coastal erosion being one of the most prominent and hazardous features. Using drone platforms, satellite images and historic aerial photos, we observed the rapid retreat of a permafrost coastline on Qikiqtaruk–Herschel Island, Yukon Territory, in the Canadian Beaufort Sea. Erosion of this coast increasingly threatens the settlement located on the Kuvluraq–Simpson Point gravel spit. This spit accommodates several culturally significant sites and is the logistical base for the Qikiqtaruk–Herschel Island Territorial Park operations. The objectives of this study were to demonstrate the effective use of low-cost lightweight drones for: (i) assessing short-term coastal erosion dynamics over fine temporal resolution, (ii) evaluating short-term change detection in the context of long-term observations of shoreline change, and (iii) demonstrating the potential of these measurement tools for park management and decision makers. Using drones, we resurveyed a 500 m permafrost coastal reach at high temporal frequency (seven surveys over 40 days in 2017). The observed intra-seasonal shoreline changes were related to meteorological and oceanographic variables to understand intra-seasonal erosion dynamics. To put our short-term observations into historical context, we integrated analysis of shoreline positions in 2016 and 2017 with historical observations from 1952, 1970, 2000, and 2011. We found drone surveys analysed with image-based modelling yield fine-grain and accurately geolocated observations that are highly suitable to observe intra-seasonal erosion dynamics. In 2017, we observed coastal retreat of 14.5 m a−1, more than six times faster than the long-term average rate of 2.2 ± 0.2 m a−1 (1952–2017). Over a single 4 day period, coastline retreat exceeded 1 ± 0.1 m d−1. Our findings highlight the episodic nature of shoreline change, which is poorly understood along permafrost coastlines. We conclude that the data available from drones is an effective tool to understand better the mechanistic short-term controls on coastal erosion dynamics and thus long-term coastline change, and has strong potential to support local management decisions regarding coastal settlements in rapidly changing Arctic landscapes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClimate change and permafrost→French-language works237,207→