MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4243412867 · doi:10.1109/lcnw.2013.6758467

Technical program of LCN 2013 and adjunct workshops

2013· article· en· W4243412867 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversitat Politècnica de ValènciaUniversity of California, DavisUniversity of California, Los AngelesUniversidade Federal do Espírito SantoTelenor GroupIndian Institute of Technology MandiUniversitat de les Illes BalearsRWTH Aachen UniversityNational University of SingaporeCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationUniversidad de ZaragozaTechnische Universität DarmstadtUniversità degli Studi di PadovaCairo UniversityNew York Institute of TechnologyCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesTsinghua UniversityLahore University of Management SciencesChinese Academy of SciencesUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaTechnische Universiteit DelftCarnegie Mellon UniversityKorea UniversityVictoria UniversitySwinburne University of TechnologyUniversity of SydneyPolitecnico di TorinoDublin City UniversitySoutheast UniversityMonash UniversityUniversity College CorkAustralian National UniversityUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaEidgenössische Technische Hochschule ZürichUniversity of MemphisInner Mongolia UniversityUniversity of Technology SydneyOak Ridge National LaboratoryUniversity of New South WalesVictoria University of WellingtonKuwait UniversityNational ICT AustraliaJordan University of Science and TechnologyUniversity of AlbertaTechnische Universität BerlinInstitute of Software, Chinese Academy of SciencesUniversidade de LisboaUniversity of OtagoUniversitetet i OsloState University of New York at New PaltzUniversity of West LondonUniversity of CaliforniaUniversidade Estadual de CampinasRMIT UniversityUniversität ZürichUniversity of Canterbury
KeywordsAdjunctComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wellness is important for development and sustainability of smart cities.This talk will share our experiences with design of Wellness robots like Sophie and Charlie and their trials in private homes in Australia.The talk will demonstrate integration of social design with technology design to enhance the subjective emotional well being of their human partners.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.232
Threshold uncertainty score0.776

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2320.119

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Systems and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207