MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4243431621 · doi:10.1017/s0261444805232391

Language learning

2004· article· en· W4243431621 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLanguage Teaching · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPurdue University
KeywordsGrammarReading (process)PsychologySecond-language acquisitionLibrary scienceLinguisticsComputer sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

04–358 Bishop, Graham (Open U., UK), First steps towards electronic marking of language assignments . Language Learning Journal (London, UK), 29 (2004), 42–46. 04–359 Coniam, David and Wong, Richard (Chinese U. of Hong Kong; Email : coniam@ cuhk.edu.hk ). Internet Relay Chat as a tool in the autonomous development of ESL learners' English language ability: an exploratory study . System (Oxford, UK), 32 , 3 (2004), 321–335. 04–360 Cooke, Melanie, Wallace, Catherine, with Shrubshall, Paul. Inside Out/Outside In: a study of reading in ESOL classrooms . Language Issues (Birmingham, UK), 16 , 1 (2004), 7–12. 04–361 Dewey, Dan (U. of Pittsburgh, USA; Email : ddewey@pitt.edu ). A comparison of reading development by learners of Japanese in intensive domestic immersion and study abroad contexts . Studies in Second Language Acquisition (New York, USA), 26 (2004), 303–327. 04–362 Ferris, Dana R. (California State U., Sacramento, USA). The grammar correction debate in L2 writing: where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime…?) . Journal of Second Language Writing (New York, USA), 13 , 1 (2004), 49–62. 04–363 Gaskell, Delian and Cobb, Thomas (U. de Québec à Montréal, Canada; Email : cobb.tom@uqam.ca ). Can learners use concordance feedback for writing errors? System (Oxford, UK), 32 , 3 (2004), 301–319. 04–364 Goldstein, Lynn M. (Monterey Institute of International Studies, California, USA). Questions and answers about teacher written commentary and student revision: teachers and students working together . Journal of Second Language Writing (New York, USA), 13 , 1 (2004), 63–80. 04–365 Hall, Kathy, Allan, Christine, Dean, Jacqui and Warren, Sue (Leeds Metropolitan U., UK; Email : k.hall@lmu.ac.uk ). Classroom discourse in the Literacy Hour in England: a study of two lessons . Language, Culture and Curriculum (Clevedon, UK), 16 , 3 (2003), 284–297. 04–366 Ivanič, Roz (Lancaster U., UK; Email : r.ivanic@lancs.ac.uk ). Discourses of writing and learning to write . Language and Education (Clevedon, UK), 18 , 3 (2004), 220–245. 04–367 Kapp, Rochelle (U. of Cape Town, South Africa; Email : rkapp@ched.uct.ac.za ). ‘Reading on the line”: an analysis of literacy practices in ESL classes in a South African township school . Language and Education (Clevedon, UK), 18 , 3 (2004), 246–263. 04–368 Kubota, Ryuko and Lehner, Al (U. of North Carolina, USA; Email : rkubota@email.unc.edu ). Toward critical contrastive analysis . Journal of Second Language Writing (New York, USA), 13 , 1 (2004), 7–27. 04–369 McNamara, Danielle S. (U. of Memphis, USA; Email : d.mcnamara@mail.psyc.memphis.edu ). SERT: self-explanation reading training . Discourse Processes (New York, USA), 38 , 1 (2004), 1–30. 04–370 Mokhtari, Kouider, and Reichard, Carla (Miami U., Ohio, USA; Email : mohktak@muohio.edu ). Investigating the strategic reading processes of first and second language readers in two different cultural contexts . System (Oxford, UK), 32 , 3 (2004), 379–394. 04–371 Mori, S. (Kinki U., Japan; Email : squiddly@leto.eonet.ne.jp ). Significant motivational predictors of the amount of reading by EFL learners in Japan . RELC Journal (Singapore), 35 , 1 (2004), 63–81. 04–372 O, K-M. (Dongduk U., Korea, Email : kmo@dongduk.ac.kr ). Individualized Teacher-Student Interaction in EFL Writing Class: Action Research . English Teaching (Anseonggun, South Korea), 58 , 4 (2003), 99–126. 04–373 Pulido, Diana (Washington State U., USA; Email : dpulido@wsu.edu ). The relationship between text comprehension and second language incidental vocabulary acquisition: a matter of topic familiarity? Language Learning (Malden, Massachusetts, USA), 54 , 3 (2004), 469–523. 04–374 Sasaki, Miyuki (Nagoya Gakuin U., Japan; Email : sasaki@ngu.ac.jp ). A multiple-data analysis of the 3.5-Year development of EFL student writers . Language Learning (Malden, Massachusetts, USA), 54 , 3 (2004), 525–582. 04–375 Walczyk, Jeffrey J., Marsiglia, Cheryl S., Johns, Amanda K. and Bryan, Keli S. (Louisiana Tech U., USA; Email : Walczyk@latech.edu ). Children's compensations for poorly automated reading skills . Discourse Processes (New York, USA), 37 , 1 (2004), 47–66. 04–376 Walter, Catherine (Institute of Education, U. of London UK). Transfer of reading comprehension skills to L2 is linked to mental representations of text and to L2 working memory . Applied Linguistics (Oxford, UK), 25 , 3 (2004), 315–339. 04–377 Wang, Xiang (Jiangsu U., PR of China). Encouraging self-monitoring in writing by Chinese students . ELT Journal (Oxford, UK), 58 , 3 (2004), 238–246.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.322
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it