MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4243446836 · doi:10.1161/atvb.37.suppl_1.497

Abstract 497: Sex Differences in the Relationship Between Pro-Inflammatory Adipokines, Chemerin and Resistin, and Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque Instability

2017· article· en· W4243446836 on OpenAlexaffabout
Karina Gasbarrino, Russell Yanofsky, Carina Sancho, Fanny Jaunet, Huaien Zheng, Chi Lai, John P. Veinot, Stella S. Daskalopoulou

Bibliographic record

VenueArteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicAtherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaUniversité de MontréalMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResistinChemerinAdipokineMedicineInternal medicineInflammationEndocrinologyGastroenterologyLeptinObesity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Sex differences in plaque morphology and composition exist; men develop more unstable plaques than women. Yet, stroke kills more women than men. Despite these differences, no sex-specific guidelines for carotid disease management exist. Thus, markers that reflect sex-specific morphological features in the plaque should be explored for better prediction of stroke risk. Pro-inflammatory adipokines, chemerin and resistin, influence vascular function. Herein we are the first to investigate sex differences in the relationship between carotid plaque instability and the expression of these adipokines. Methods: Subjects with ≥50% carotid stenosis scheduled for a carotid endarterectomy were recruited from McGill-affiliated hospitals. Pre-operative plasma chemerin and resistin levels were measured using ELISA. Stability of carotid plaque specimens was assessed by two gold standard histological classifications. Stable and unstable plaques were immunostained for chemerin, chemerin’s receptor (ChemR23), and resistin. Digital and semi-quantifications assessed the % area of expression as well as staining intensity (mild to high) and % of positively stained macrophages/foam cells. Plaque mRNA expression was assessed by quantitative PCR. Sex-hormone analyses are ongoing. Results: Men (n=171) had more unstable plaque features, i.e., greater hemorrhage (P=0.022), lipid core size (P<0.001), inflammation (P=0.007), cap infiltration (P=0.006), and less fibrous tissue (P<0.001) than women (n=79). Circulating chemerin and resistin levels were similar between men and women and no sex differences were observed in relation to plaque instability. The % area of chemerin and resistin staining in the plaque was greater in unstable vs stable plaques in men only (P=0.040; P=0.005, respectively). Similarly, greater intensity in chemerin, ChemR23, and resistin staining was associated with plaque instability in men only (P<0.001; P=0.013; P=0.033, respectively). In contrast, lower resistin plaque mRNA expression was associated with plaque instability in women only (P=0.040). Conclusion: Our results suggest the possibility of a sex-dependent regulatory mechanism underlying the connection between these adipokines and plaque instability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular BiologySame topicAtherosclerosis and Cardiovascular DiseasesFrench-language works237,207