MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4243478633 · doi:10.1002/essoar.10500015.1

Radiation-enhanced fission track annealing revisited and consequences for apatite thermochronometry

2018· preprint· en· W4243478633 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Kalin T. McDannell, D R Issler, Paul O’Sullivan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of Canada
FundersNatural Resources Canada
KeywordsFission track datingZirconGeologyGeochemistryApatitePrecambrianTitaniteMineralogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Apatite fission track (AFT) analyses for granitoid and metamorphic bedrock samples from the Western Superior Province (Ontario), the Churchill-Rae Province (Melville Peninsula and Southampton Island, Nunavut), and the Slave Province (Northwest Territories) show a broad range of single grain effective uranium concentrations (eU) (less than 1 to ~300 ppm) and some of the oldest reported AFT ages in North America. Although most of our samples have a typical fluorapatite composition (effective Cl less than 0.1 apfu) with implied low track retentivity, single grain AFT ages are overdispersed and decrease with increasing eU content. This eU-age relationship is resonant of the Hendriks and Redfield (Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 236, 443-458, 2005) argument for α-radiation enhanced fission track annealing (REA) and is analogous to the negative age-eU correlation observed in published zircon and titanite (U-Th)/He data from slowly-cooled cratonic rocks. The high intra-sample age variability for low-Cl bedrock apatites with protracted histories (greater than 200-500 m.y.) at less than 100°C since the Precambrian suggests strong REA control on AFT ages. Conversely, some low Cl AFT samples with a narrower eU range show less age dispersion and a weak apparent age-eU correlation. A complex trade-off between radiation damage and chemical composition (e.g. low Cl and REE enrichment) is implied when eU and rmr0 (and equivalent effective Cl) are correlated. In all cases, the samples fail the canonical χ2 test to evaluate if grains are from a single age population (χ2 less than 5%) and have characteristic “open jaw” radial plots, generally considered to indicate multiple age populations. Previous assessments of the influence of REA on AFT age were based on evaluating central age and mean track length, which potentially mask high single-grain age scatter and REA effects. Therefore, it is crucial that bedrock samples exhibiting high age scatter are evaluated in terms of intra-sample compositional heterogeneity. AFT samples with relatively low Cl concentrations are especially prone to greater REA control of cooling ages and this underscores the need for routine acquisition of compositional data for AFT datasets. Our broad range in single-grain AFT ages (with no other clear, strong compositional controls) supports the notion that radiation damage affects both the AFT and (U-Th)/He thermochronometers in slowly-cooled settings and must be accounted for during thermal modeling and interpretation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→