Bibliographic record
Abstract
The high fidelity detection of multiple DNA sequences in multiplex assays calls for duplexes whose stability is independent of sequence (isostable DNA), forming under universally stringent conditions. Nature did not evolve DNA to form isostable duplexes. Here we report how probe strands can be modified so that an all-A/T target strand is bound with the same or slightly higher affinity than the corresponding all-G/C strand with the same sequence of purines and pyrimidines. We refer to these probes that feature covalently attached ligands as "decorated nucleic acids". Caps, intercalators, and locks were used to stabilize A/T duplexes, and N4-ethylcytosine residues were employed to tune down the stability of G/C duplexes without significantly affecting base pairing selectivity. Near-isostability was demonstrated in solution and on microarrays of high and low density. Further, it is shown that hybridization results involving decorated probes on microarrays can be predicted on the basis of thermodynamic data for duplex formation in solution. Predictable formation of isostable DNA not only benefits microarrays for gene expression analysis and genotyping, but may also improve the sequence-specificity of other applications that rely on the massively parallel formation of Watson-Crick duplexes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".