Bibliographic record
Abstract
HE present paper is a direct continuation of, and was prepared T at the same time as, a first part which has already been published (BERNSTR~M, 1952).As to the purpose of the investigation, the methods employed, etc., reference is made to the section previously published.and PI P2 P25 P26 P29 P 3 1 P 5 1 P 5 3 IV.EXPERIMENTAL.(Continued.) 2. L. PURPUREUM.Fifteen pure lines of this species were used in crossing experiments, several more were cultivated.The 15 lines are:From the neighbourhood of Gothenburg, Sweden.Ditto.Both these lines are tall, with the most convex leaves within the collection.The uppermost leaves in p 2 are, however, riches in anthocyan than in pl, and the flowers are also darker than those of the latter.From Lund, Sweden.Fairly like the two above-mentioned lines but low-growing, and the shape of the flowers and the markings of the lip are different.From Waadt, Switzerland.Stiffly upright, light green.The pollen lemon-gold, in the other lines orange-red.From the neighbourhood of hlalmo, Sweden.Is recognized by the size and density of the flower pattern, its rather low height, and its light green colour.From Central Bohuslan, Sweden.The flowers are pure white.Much later to begin flowering than the other lines, especially in the autumn.From Lund.The flowers are white with violet spottings on the lip, and violet streaks on the tube.From Lund.The flowers are rosy instead of the usual purplish-red colour of the species.Hereditns SS.YIS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".