Bibliographic record
Abstract
e begin 2017 with a countdown towards the Canadian Association of Optometrists' biennial Congress in Ottawa, where many members will gather for several days of reunions and continuing education, culminating in the Canada Day festivities on Parliament Hill that mark our nation's sesquicentennial birthday party.Looking back over the past 50 years, Canada and our profession have seen many changes.In 1967, as the lyrics of Bobby Gimby's centennial song Canada wafted over the radio and school announcement systems, 20 million Canadians looked forward to completion of the Trans-Canada Highway and the opening of Expo 67 in Montreal.Bilintheir last Stanley Cup.Optometry was working towards acceptance as a true health profession as its once private College in Toronto prepared to move to the University of Waterloo and become a public institution.society that welcomes immigrants and refugees more than ever before in its history, swelling our population to 36 million.Optometry is no longer a "drugless" health discipline, and is accepted as an integral part of primary health care from coast to coast to coast.Our two university-based Schools of Optometry and Vision Science have solid academic and clinical reputations nationally and internationally.Despite optometry's advances, there still remain unmet vision needs in Canada.In this issue, Dr. Chris and colleagues discuss one gap they found in First Nations schools, and Dr. Andrew Rixon presents a review of ocular hypertension.An Optocase Mini on chalazion and two short articles on practice management round out this issue.Later this year, look for our supplement on glaucoma.If you haven't gotten around to it, please consider registering for the CAO Congress.I look forward to seeing many of you in Ottawa in June.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.440 | 0.318 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".