Bibliographic record
Abstract
Denis Minns, Irenaeus: An Introduction, reviewed by Daniel R. Driver Edward Morgan, The Incarnation of the Word: The Theology of Language of Augustine of Hippo, reviewed by Sean A. Otto Paul R. Kolbet, Augustine and the Cure of Souls: Revising a Classical Ideal, reviewed by Charles Meeks Pamela Sue Anderson and Jordan Bell, Kant and Theology, reviewed by David Ney Brian Hollon, Everything Is Sacred: Spiritual Exegesis in the Political Theology of Henri de Lubac, reviewed by David Ney Sergius Bulgakov, Jacob's Ladder: On Angels. Trans. Thomas Allan Smith, reviewed by Walter Sisto Keith L. Johnson, Karl Barth and the Analogia Entis, reviewed by C. Pierson Shaw Jr. Jacques Ellul, On Freedom, Love, and Power, reviewed by Spencer Boersma Richard J. Plantinga, Thomas R. Thompson, and Matthew D. Lundberg, An Introduction to Christian Theology, reviewed by Matthew W.I. Dunn Declan Marmion and Rik Van Nieuwenhove, An Introduction to the Trinity, reviewed by Paul Ladouceur Matt Jenson and David Wilhite, The Church: A Guide for the Perplexed, reviewed by Ellen M. Leonard csj Bruce G. Epperly, Process Theology: A Guide for the Perplexed, reviewed by Wayne Lott Minna Hietamäki, Agreeable Agreement: An Examination of the Quest for Consensus in Ecumenical Dialogue, reviewed by James E. Pedlar Rebecca Kratz Mays, ed., Interfaith Dialogue at the Grass Roots, reviewed by Darren J. Dias Keith Ward, More Than Matter? Is There More to Life Than Molecules?, reviewed by Donald Wiebe
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".