MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4243979532 · doi:10.5194/tc-2020-87

Seasonal and Interannual Variability of Melt-Season Albedo at Haig Glacier, Canadian Rocky Mountains

2020· preprint· en· W4243979532 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Shawn J. Marshall, Kristina Miller

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsAlbedo (alchemy)SnowEnvironmental scienceSnowpackGlacier mass balanceGlacierClimatologyAtmospheric sciencesCryosphereIce-albedo feedbackPhysical geographyGeologyAntarctic sea iceGeographyMeteorologySea ice

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. In situ observations of summer albedo are presented for the period 2002–2017 from Haig Glacier in the Canadian Rocky Mountains. The observations provide insight into the seasonal evolution and interannual variability of snow and ice albedo, including the effects of summer snowfall, the decay of snow albedo through the melt season, and the potential short-term impacts of regional wildfire activity on ice albedo reductions. Mean summer albedo (±1σ) recorded at an automatic weather station in the upper ablation zone of the glacier was αS = 0.55 ± 0.07 over this period, with no evidence of long-term albedo trends. Each summer the surface conditions at the weather station undergo a transition from a dry, reflective springsnowpack (αS ∼ 0.8), to a wet, homogeneous mid-summer snowpack (αS ∼ 0.5), to exposed, impurity-rich glacier ice, with ameasured albedo of 0.21 ± 0.06 over the study period. The ice albedo drops to ~ 0.1 during years of intense regional wildfire activity such as 2003 and 2017, but it recovers from this in subsequent years. Summer snowfall events have a significant influence on albedo, and a stochastic parameterization of these events is shown to improve modelled estimates of summer albedo and mass balance. Modifications to conventional degree-day melt factors are also suggested, to better capture the effects of seasonal albedo evolution in climate, hydrology, and glacier mass balance models that use temperature index or positive-degree day methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryospheric studies and observations→French-language works237,207→