Bibliographic record
Abstract
Citation (2015), "List of Contributors", Comparative Sciences: Interdisciplinary Approaches (International Perspectives on Education and Society, Vol. 26), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. vii-viii. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-367920140000026015 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2015 Emerald Group Publishing Limited Karen L. Biraimah College of Education, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA Pepka A. Boyadjieva Institute for the Study of Societies and Knowledge, BAS, Sofia, Bulgaria Oksana Chigisheva Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation Ailie Cleghorn Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada Lynn Davies University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK Klara Skubic Ermenc University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia Olga Fedotova Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation Maren Heidemann University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK Petya I. Ilieva-Trichkova Institute for the Study of Societies and Knowledge, BAS, Sofia, Bulgaria; Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland Agreement L. Jotia University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana Anna Kirova University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada Christine Massing University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada Vusi Mncube University of South Africa, Muckleneuk Campus, South Africa Renuka Naidoo University of South Africa, Muckleneuk Campus, South Africa Marina Nicolosi University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy Alessandra Pera University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy Nikolay Popov Sofia University, Sofia, Bulgaria Larry Prochner University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada Chanita Rukspollmuang Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand Alexander W. Wiseman Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA C. C. Wolhuter North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa Book Chapters Comparative Sciences: Interdisciplinary Approaches International Perspectives on Education and Society Comparative Sciences: Interdisciplinary Approaches Copyright Page List of Contributors Preface An Introduction to Comparing Comparative Methodologies: A Framework for Understanding Pitfalls and Operationalizing Promises Part I: Methodological Considerations in Comparative Sciences Quisnam Sum Ego? Crises of Identity in Comparative Education and the Call for a Comparison of Comparative Studies The Role of Comparative Pedagogy in Comparative Educational Research Comparative Analysis: Methodological Optics in the Ideological Context Early Childhood Teacher Education in Namibia and Canada Comparative Interpretation Standards in Uniform International Law Part II: Empirical Comparative Studies Crossing the North-South Divide: A Critical Analysis of Study Abroad Programs to Emerging Nations Higher Education and Social Trust: A European Comparative Perspective Democratic School Governance, Leadership and Management: A Case Study of Two Schools in South Africa Situational Analysis of Education for International Understanding in Thailand Family Needs and Female Work: A Comparative Survey of Public Policies and Private Choices on Equal Opportunities About the Authors Index
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.037 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".