EFFECT OF UV RADIATION AND TRISODIUM PHOSPHATE ON BACTERIAL DECONTAMINATION OF CHICKEN FILLETS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One hundred random samples of chicken fillets were collected from an automatic poultry slaughtering plant in Dakahlia Governorate just after preparation. The samples were divided into five groups, each group consists of 20 chicken fillets examined for Aerobic Plate Count (APC), Enterobacteriaceae and Most Probable Number (MPN) of coliforms. Thefirst group dipped in 10% Triodium phosphate (TSP) for 30 seconds where the counts were reduced by 0.75,0.78 and 0.59 log cfu/gm, the second group were decontaminated with UV radiation for a minute where reduced by 0.45,0.34and 0.35log cfu/gm, the thirdgroup were decontaminated with UV radiation for three minutes where it reduced by 0.79, 0.64 and 0.67 log cfu/gm, The fourth group were dipped in 10% TSP for 30s then exposed to UV radiation for a minute where it reduced by 1.30,1.31 and 1.14 log cfu/gm and The fifth group were dipped in 10% TSP for 30s then exposed to UV radiation for three minutes where it reduced by 1.44,1.54 and 1.51 log cfu/gm respectively. The obtained results revealed that there were a significant reduction when compared with those before decontamination statistically for all groups (P<0.05). In conclusion, application of 10% TSP&UV reduced the aforementioned bacteria significantly (P<0.05), Therefore this study was focused on the effect of 10% TSP and/or UV radiation on bacterial populations, Enterobacteriaceae and Coliforms counts in chicken fillets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it