Book Reviews
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Joseph Blenkinsopp, Treasures Old & New: Essays in the Theology of the Pentateuch., reviewed by John Van Seters Mark Boda, Haggai & Zechariah Research: A Bibliographic Survey, reviewed by John Kessler Richard A. Burridge and Graham Gould, Jesus Now and Then, reviewed by Agnes Choi James D.G. Dunn, Jesus Remembered, reviewed by Robert L. Webb Isaac Kalimi, The Reshaping of Ancient Israelite History in Chronicles, reviewed by Christine Mitchell Jacob Milgrom, Leviticus—A Continental Commentary, reviewed by Bernon P. Lee Jacob Neusner, Transformations in Ancient Judaism: Textual Evidence for Creative Responses to Crisis., reviewed by Norman Tobias S.A. Nigosian, From Ancient Writings to Sacred Texts: The Old Testament andApocrypha., reviewed by Andrea K. Di Giovanni John Sandys-Wunsch, What Have They Done to the Bible? A History of Modern Biblical Interpretation, reviewed by Laura D. Alary Daniel J. Simundson, Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Jonah, Micah. Abingdon Old Testament Commentaries, reviewed by Briana Boyeon Lee Bonnie B. Thurston & Judith M. Ryan, Philippians & Philemon. Sacra Pagina, reviewed by Duncan Reid James C. VanderKam, From Joshua to Caiaphas, reviewed by Karl J. McDaniel William Yarchin, History of Biblical Interpretation: A Reader, reviewed by Amanda W. Benckhuysen William H. Brackney, A Genetic History of Baptist Thought, reviewed by Scott N. Kindred-Barnes Peter Matheson, The Imaginative World of the Reformation, reviewed by Alan L. Hayes Kim Ian Parker, The Biblical Politics of John Locke, reviewed by Jonathan Chaplin Junietta Baker McCall, Bereavement Counseling: Pastoral Care for Complicated Grieving, reviewed by Kathleen O'Neill Arthur Van Seters, Preaching and Ethics, reviewed by Stephen J.H. Tu Marguerite Abdul-Masih, Edward Schillebeeckx and Hans Frei: A Conversation on Method and Christology, reviewed by Margaret Lavin Hans Boersma, Violence, Hospitality and the Cross: Reappropriating the Atonement Tradition, reviewed by Jonathan Slater Frederick E. Crowe, Christ and History: The Christology o/Bernard Lonerganfrom 1935 to 1982, reviewed by Charles Hefling Oliver Davies, A Theology of Compassion: Metaphysics of Difference and the Renewal of Tradition, reviewed by Michael Stoeber Robert D. Denham, Northrop Frye: Religious Visionary and Architect of the Spiritual World., reviewed by David J. Leigh Stanley Hauerwas, Performing the Faith: Bonhoeffer and the Practice of Nonviolence, reviewed by John F. Duggan George Hunsinger, ed., For the Sake of the World: Karl Barth and the Future of Ecclesial Theology., reviewed by Philip G. Ziegler John C. McDowell and Mike Higton, eds., Conversing with Barth, reviewed by Alison Hari-Singh M. John Farrelly, The Trinity: Rediscovering the Central Christian Mystery, reviewed by Michael J. Stogre Daniel L. Migliore, Faith Seeking Understanding: An Introduction to Christian Theology, 2nd ed., reviewed by Laurence K. Chin George P. Schner, Essays Catholic and Critical, reviewed by David Alstad Tiessen James K.A. Smith, Introducing Radical Orthodoxy: Mapping a Post-Secular Theology, reviewed by Christiaan Jacobs-Vandegeer James K.A. Smith and Henry Isaac Venema, eds., The Hermeneutics of Charity: Interpretation, Selfhood, and Postmodern Faith. Studies in Honor of James H. Olthuis, reviewed by Geoffrey Williams George R. Sumner, The First and the Last: The Claim of Jesus Christ and the Claims of Other Religious Traditions, reviewed by Donald Wiebe Peter van Inwagen, ed., Christian Faith and the Problem of Evil, reviewed by Nathan R.B. Loewen Harold Wells, The Christie Center: Lifo-Giving and Liberating, reviewed by Don Schweitzer Michael Wyschogrod, Abraham's Promise: Judaism and Jewish-Christian Relations, reviewed by Margaret Robinson
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.500 | 0.533 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".