MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4244187426 · doi:10.1159/000334350

IALP News

2011· article· fr· W4244187426 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFolia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicStuttering Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLinguisticsNatural language processingComputer sciencePsychologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CAPCSD Is the Newest Affiliate Society to IALPIALP welcomes the Council of Academic Programs in Communication Sciences and Disorders (CAPCSD), an American association founded in 1978, currently with 260 members, as the newest Affiliate Society to our organization, type B. The mission of this Council is 'to promote quality, accessibility and innovation in communication sciences and disorders in higher education'.The CAPCSD aims to advance the highest standards in pedagogy, clinical background and research.Moreover, one of their important goals is to facilitate recruitment, education and retention of both faculty and students to meet the public need.The Council president is Michael Kimbarow, PhD.The CAPSCD supports programs worldwide that educate undergraduate and graduate students in the communication sciences and disorders.They represent over 2,000 academic, clinical and administrative staff members affiliated with over 260 institutions in the United States, Puerto Rico, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.A planned conference for 2012, April 18th to 21st, in Newport Beach, Calif., is getting organized with the main theme 'Sustaining Global Alliances', including sessions for leadership development, cooperative problem-solving and information exchange, as well as many other opportunities for learning and networking.For more information, please visit the webpage www.capcsd.org.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.832
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0400.032

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFolia Phoniatrica et LogopaedicaSame topicStuttering Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207