MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4244289689 · doi:10.1093/jxb/52.354.123

Gas exchange by pods and subtending leaves and internal recycling of CO 2 by pods of chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.) subjected to water deficits

2001· article· en· W4244289689 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Qifu Ma, M.H. Behboudian, Neil C. Turner, Jairo A. Palta

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Experimental Botany · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant responses to elevated CO2
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMassey UniversityCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationMcMaster University
KeywordsPhotosynthesisTranspirationPhotosynthetically active radiationRespirationBiologyHorticultureBotanyPlant physiologyRespiration rate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Terminal drought markedly reduces leaf photosynthesis of chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.) during seed filling. A study was initiated to determine whether photosynthesis and internal recycling of CO 2 by the pods can compensate for the low rate of photosynthesis in leaves under water deficits. The influence of water deficits on the rates of photosynthesis and transpiration of pods and subtending leaves in chickpea (cv. Sona) was investigated in two naturally‐lit, temperature‐controlled glasshouses. At values of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) of 900 μmol m −2 s −1 and higher, the rate of net photosynthesis of subtending leaves of 10‐d‐old pods was 24 and 6 μmol m −2 s −1 in the well‐watered (WW) and water‐stressed (WS) plants when the covered‐leaf water potential (Ψ) was −0.6 and −1.4 MPa, respectively. Leaf photosynthesis further decreased to 4.5 and 0.5 μmol m −2 s −1 as Ψ decreased to −2.3 and −3.3 MPa, respectively. At 900–1500 μmol m −2 s −1 PAR, the net photosynthetic rate of 10‐d‐old pods was 0.9–1.0 μmol m −2 s −1 in the WW plants and was −0.1 to −0.8 μmol m −2 s −1 in the WS plants. The photosynthetic rates of both pods and subtending leaves decreased with age, but the rate of transpiration of the pods increased with age. The rates of respiration and net photosynthesis inside the pods were estimated by measuring the changes in the internal concentration of CO 2 of covered and uncovered pods during the day. Both the WW and WS pods had similar values of internal net photosynthesis, but the WS pods showed significantly higher rates of respiration suggesting that the WS pods had higher gross photosynthetic rates than the WW pods, particularly in the late afternoon. When 13 CO 2 was injected into the gas space inside the pod, nearly 80% of the labelled carbon 24 h after injection was observed in the pod wall in both the WW and WS plants. After 144 h the proportion of 13 C in the seed had increased from 19% to 32% in both treatments. The results suggest that internal recycling of CO 2 inside the pod may assist in maintaining seed filling in water‐stressed chickpea.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.279

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Experimental BotanySame topicPlant responses to elevated CO2French-language works237,207