Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes 1. All translations from the Turkish are my own. 1. For more details on the implications of such assumptions, or rather presuppositions, about translation see Tymoczko (2006 Tymoczko , Maria . 2006 . Reconceptualizing Western translation theory. Integrating non-Western thought about translation . In Translating others . 1 Theo Hermans , 13 32 . Manchester : St Jerome . [Google Scholar], 2007 Tymoczko, Maria. 2007. Enlarging translation, empowering translators, Manchester: St Jerome. [Google Scholar]). 2. For recent contributions to this debate see Kosok (2004 Kosok , Heinz . 2004 . Cracks in the jug: Recent translations/adaptations of Continental plays by Irish dramatists . In Drama translation and theatre practice Sabine Coelsch-Foisner Holger Klein , 99 120 . Frankfurt/Main : Peter Lang . [Google Scholar]); Perteghella (2008 Perteghella, Manuela. 2008. Adaptation: Bastard child or critique? Putting terminology centre stage. Journal of Romance Studies, 8(3): 51–65. [Google Scholar]); Krebs and Minier (2009).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it