MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4244352039 · doi:10.1002/pssb.200301540

Photoluminescence studies of isotopically enriched silicon

2002· article· en· W4244352039 on OpenAlexaff
D. Karaiskaj, M. L. W. Thewalt, T. Ruf, M. Cardona

Bibliographic record

Venuephysica status solidi (b) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotoluminescenceExcitonSiliconBoronGermaniumMaterials scienceAcceptorPhononLuminescenceDiamondBand gapBinding energyMolecular physicsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Atomic physicsChemistryCondensed matter physicsOptoelectronicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We report the first high resolution photoluminescence studies of isotopically pure silicon. New information is obtained on isotopic effects on the indirect band gap energy, phonon energies, and phonon broadenings, which is in good agreement with previous results obtained in germanium and diamond. Remarkably, the line widths of the no‐phonon boron and phosphorus bound exciton transitions in the 28Si sample (99.896% 28Si) are much sharper than in natural Si, revealing new fine structure in the boron bound exciton luminescence. Most surprisingly, the small splittings of the neutral acceptor ground state in natural Si are absent in the photoluminescence spectra of acceptor bound excitons in isotopically purified 28Si, demonstrating conclusively that they result from the randomness of the Si isotopic composition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuephysica status solidi (b)Same topicDiamond and Carbon-based Materials ResearchFrench-language works237,207