Bibliographic record
Abstract
Citation (2016), "List of Contributors", Research in the Sociology of Work (Research in the Sociology of Work, Vol. 29), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. ix-x. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0277-283320160000029004 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2016 Emerald Group Publishing Limited Kathryn Freeman Anderson Department of Sociology, University of Houston, TX, USA Andrew S. Fullerton Department of Sociology, Oklahoma State University at Stillwater, OK, USA C. Elizabeth Hirsh Department of Sociology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada Julie A. Kmec Department of Sociology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA Robin Leidner Department of Sociology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA Amanda E. Lewis Department of Sociology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA Michael A. Long Department of Social Sciences and Languages, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK Jennifer L. Nelson Department of Sociology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA David Orzechowicz Department of Sociology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA Brian Ott Department of Sociology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA Vincent J. Roscigno Department of Sociology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA Michael L. Siciliano Department of Sociology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA Sheryl Skaggs School of Social Sciences, University of Texas, Dallas, TX, USA Eli Wilson Department of Sociology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA George Wilson Department of Sociology, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA Book Chapters Research in the Sociology of Work Research in the Sociology of Work Research in the Sociology of Work Copyright Page Editorial Advisory Board List of Contributors The Changing Field of Workplace Sociology: An Introduction to Volume 29 Part I: Identity Work Work Identity without Steady Work: Lessons from Stage Actors “I’m a Teacher, Not a Babysitter”: Workers’ Strategies for Managing Identity-Related Denials of Dignity in the Early Childhood Workplace Part II: Authority and Control at Work Job Authority and Stratification Beliefs Matching Up: Producing Proximal Service in a Los Angeles Restaurant Control from on High: Cloud-Computing, Skill, and Acute Frustration among Analytics Workers in the Digital Publishing Industry The Limits of Control in Service Work: Interactive Routines and Interactional Competence Part III: Gender, Sexuality and Precarity The Walk-In Closet: Between “Gay-Friendly” and “Post-Closeted” Work Workplace Regulation of Sexual Harassment and Federal and State-Level Legal Environments Job Insecurity and Substance Use in the United States: Stress, Strain, and the Gendering of Precarious Employment
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.035 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.714 | 0.727 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".