MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4244644605 · doi:10.5194/acp-2021-245

The effect of (NH <sub>4</sub> ) <sub>2</sub> SO <sub>4</sub> on the freezing properties of non-mineral dust ice nucleating substances of atmospheric relevance

2021· preprint· en· W4244644605 on OpenAlexaff
Soleil E. Worthy, Anand Kumar, Xi Yu, Jingwei Yun, Jessie Chen, Cuishan Xu, Victoria E. Irish, Pierre Amato, Allan K. Bertram

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIcing and De-icing Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIce nucleusChemistryMineral dustMineralKaolinitePotassiumMineralogyEnvironmental chemistryAnimal scienceNucleationAerosol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. A wide range of materials including mineral dust, soil dust, and bioaerosols have been shown to act as ice nuclei in the atmosphere. During atmospheric transport, these materials can become coated with inorganic and organic solutes which may impact their ability to nucleate ice. While a number of studies have investigated the impact of solutes at low concentrations on ice nucleation by mineral dusts, very few studies have examined their impact on non-mineral dust ice nuclei. We studied the effect of dilute (NH4)2SO4 solutions on immersion freezing of a variety of non-mineral dust ice nucleating substances including bacteria, fungi, sea ice diatom exudates, sea surface microlayer, and humic substances using the droplet freezing technique. We also studied the effect of (NH4)2SO4 on immersion freezing of mineral dust particles for comparison purposes. (NH4)2SO4 had no effect on the median freezing temperature of nine of the ten tested non-mineral dust materials. There was a small but statistically significant decrease in the median freezing temperature of the bacteria X. campestris (change in median freezing temperature ∆T_50 = -0.43 ± 0.19 °C) in the presence of (NH4)2SO4 compared to pure water. Conversely, (NH4)2SO4 increased the median freezing temperature of four different mineral dusts (Potassium-rich feldspar, Arizona Test Dust, Kaolinite, Montmorillonite) by 3 °C to 8 °C. This significant difference in the response of mineral dust and non-mineral dust ice nucleating substances when exposed to (NH4)2SO4 suggests that they nucleate ice and/or interact with (NH4)2SO4 via different mechanisms. This difference suggests that the relative importance of mineral dust to non-mineral dust particles for ice nucleation in mixed-phase clouds could increase as these particles become coated with ammonium sulfate in the atmosphere. This difference also suggests that the addition of (NH4)2SO4 to atmospheric samples of unknown composition could be used as an indicator or assay for the presence of mineral dust ice nuclei.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.132
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIcing and De-icing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207