Bibliographic record
Abstract
A Multimedia Approach to Incident Dissemination Keith Eslinger Keith Eslinger Shell Canada Limited Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE International Conference on Health, Safety, and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, March 2004. Paper Number: SPE-86734-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/86734-MS Published: March 29 2004 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Eslinger, Keith. "A Multimedia Approach to Incident Dissemination." Paper presented at the SPE International Conference on Health, Safety, and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, March 2004. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/86734-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE International Conference and Exhibition on Health, Safety, Environment, and Sustainability Search Advanced Search AbstractOn Wednesday March 12, 2003 Shell Canada Limited's Caroline Complex experienced an emergency incident due to a release of gas containing hydrogen sulphide. Because of the large area affected - more than 400 km2 and 790 residents, Shell needed a tool to disseminate the cause, the actions taken, and the barriers / recoveries in place. Communicating these issues in an easy to understand manner was key to regaining trust with the public and regulatory bodies.The Multimedia presentation was selected, and initially presented at a workshop attended by residents, other companies, and local regulators. The video was also formatted and distributed to all interested stakeholders, including other Shell operations.This paper deals with the creation of, and response to, the multimedia presentation. As a pilot project for Shell Caroline, the presentation has been very successful, and the technology will be used in future to disseminate incidents internally and externally, as well as for public consultation of new projects.The Caroline Complex and SPOGShell Canada's Caroline Complex is situated some 150 km. north of the City of Calgary, Alberta. The Complex consists of the Caroline Gas Plant, the Caroline Field including 15 producing wells, 3 compressor stations and associated pipelines, and the Shantz sulfur forming and storage facility. The Caroline Complex began operations in 1993 with estimated raw natural gas and gas liquids reserves of 56 billion cubic meters. Also operating in the area are 31 Oil and Gas Industry companies. The Caroline Complex is one of the founding members of SPOG, the Sundre Petroleum Operators Group.SPOG was formed in February 1992 with members from petroleum companies and the community. The communities in the Sundre and Caroline areas had requested that a one call system be established by which all companies would be notified so that any resident who felt there was an emergency situation could initiate action. A toll free number was set up at the SPOG Mutual Aid Co-ordination Centre (MACC) in the Shell Caroline Gas Plant Control Room. SPOG Mutual Aid is the emergency response network of the Sundre Petroleum Operators Group who monitor the "call down" system and work to improve Emergency Response in the area. Two additional work groups exist within SPOG - Community Affairs, whose vision is to develop 'A long-term relationship based on mutual trust, honesty and respect, by way of sharing pertinent information and resolving issues to benefit all stakeholders', and Environment, which was created to increase awareness of the environmental Best Practices for the Oil and Gas Industry. Currently, SPOG has 30 members companies, 13 Associate public members from area communities, and representatives from towns, Municipal Districts, and the Alberta Energy and Utilities Board (AEUB). Figure 1 shows SPOG's geographical extent - an area of approximately 1,500 square km. Keywords: investigation, presentation, upstream oil & gas, reactive measure, workshop, shell caroline, production chemistry, incident dissemination, animation, incident Subjects: Production Chemistry, Metallurgy and Biology, Flow Assurance, Health, Safety, Information Management and Systems, Hydrates This content is only available via PDF. 2004. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.045 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".