Bibliographic record
Abstract
Contributors: Dr. George Janossy, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, Dr. Maurice O'Gorman, Northwestern University, Chicago and Dr. Francis Mandy, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa As part of the effort to promote elimination of global health care disparities, this special supplement compiled 19 articles about practical diagnostic cytometry to recognize the recent achievements of laboratory scientists working in the shadow of the HIV/AIDS epidemics in resource limited settings. First, the clinical significance, diagnostic utility (as governed by international guidelines), and the historical perspectives of CD41 T cell enumeration are reviewed. Then successful large-scale implementations of cost-effective CD4 counting are described for parts of Africa, USA, and the Caribbean. These activities are linked with both the training of personnel in fledgling laboratories as well as with external quality assessment implementations. Some of the more recent solutions related to pediatric CD4 testing using CD4% values are covered. Nevertheless, the need for further simplification and parsimony is still immense, and the potential solutions are catalogued in the articles written by experts operating in truly challenging rural environments. Cytometry is considered to be an expandable flexible technology for other assays beyond CD4 assessment, particularly within organized laboratory services in the Third World. These include haematological measurements, CD38/CD8 lymphocyte activation for viral load related assessments, diagnosis of active tuberculosis and malaria, and bead-based serological assays for a variety of infectious diseases. The development and support of these emerging technologies by affluent countries is not entirely altruistic but is likely to be beneficial for both the Third and the First Worlds. Cytometry Part B Clinical Cytometry 2008;74B(Suppl. 1): S1–S164.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.638 | 0.475 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".