MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Flexible Time-Stepping Dynamic Emulation of AC/DC Grid for Faster-Than-SCADA Applications

2021· article· en· W4244815690 on OpenAlexaff
Shiqi Cao, Ning Lin, Venkata Dinavahi

Bibliographic record

Venue2021 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmulationSCADATransient (computer programming)Computer scienceField-programmable gate arrayEmbedded systemGridSimulationEngineeringElectrical engineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dynamic simulation of the integrated AC/DC grids plays a crucial role in the energy control center. In this work, a faster than supervisory control and data acquisition (FT-SCADA) emulation based on flexible time-stepping (FTS) algorithm is proposed for the energy control center to predict and mitigate the impacts after serious disturbances using field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs). To gain a high acceleration over SCADA/realtime, the FTS-based dynamic emulation is applied to the AC grid, which is the IEEE 118-bus system where a 9 -order synchronous machine model is adopted. Meanwhile, the electromagnetic transient (EMT) emulation revealing the exact performance of the DC grid provides an insight into the impact on its AC counterpart. A power-voltage interface is inserted between the AC and DC grids since distinct emulation strategies are utilized, and the EMT-dynamic co-emulation is able to run concurrently on FPGA boards due to their massive parallelism. Three case studies are emulated to demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed algorithm, and a minimum of 101 times faster-than-SCADA/real-time can be achieved. Hence, following the occurrence of a disturbance, the FT-SCADA/RT emulator will generate an optimal solution in advance to maintain the stability of the hybrid AC/DC grid. The esults of the FTS-based FT-SCADA/RT emulati <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">onareva</sup> lidated by the off-line transient stability simulation tool TSAT <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">®</sup> of the DSATools suite.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.813
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2021 IEEE Power &amp; Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM)Same topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207