MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4244818159 · doi:10.24124/2011/bpgub1513

A team approach to corporate crisis management

2011· dissertation· en· W4244818159 on OpenAlexafffund
Alison Fuhr

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPublic Relations and Crisis Communication
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British Columbia
FundersUniversity of Northern British Columbia
KeywordsCrisis managementCrisis communicationBusinessStakeholderProcess (computing)Risk managementCorporationPublic relationsEmergency managementPolitical scienceProcess managementFinanceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When a corporation fails to effectively deal with a crisis, the consequence is often the exacerbation of the crisis into other areas of the organization which ultimately causes the original crisis to evolve into a disaster.Disasters frequently result in the death of the organization.The tenets of corporate crisis management are no longer sufficient in today's dynamic envi ronment.Organizations must take a proactive and comprehensive approach to crisis management in order to maintain an acceptable level of risk.This research paper examines the relevant research on crisis models, the factors that contribute to crises, risk reduction, responses, people management, communications, stakeholder relations, eth ics, correctional action and recovery.The review of the literature identified the growing trend for organizations to utilize crisis teams to direct the crisis management process.With increasing threats posed to organizations, a single individual is no longer sufficient to co-ordinate the crisis management process; teams are better equipped to deal with the complex and ambiguous nature of crises .The crisis management team's responsibilities include risk identification and reduction, preparation, early signal detection, crisis management, organizational recovery, prevention and learning.Crisis management teams will play a growing role in the continuing viability of corporations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.007
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPublic Relations and Crisis CommunicationFrench-language works237,207