Radial Forearm Free Flap Morbidity: A Rare Case of a Normal Preoperative Arteriogram and Acute Intraoperative Hand Ischemia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since its first description in 1981, the radial forearm free flap has become a valuable tool for reconstructive microsurgery. However, there are potential complications associated with the flap – the most feared being hand ischemia from sacrifice of the radial artery. Fortunately, acute ischemic complications are exceedingly rare, with only two cases reported in the literature. Options for preoperative evaluation of the donor extremity include the Allen's test, ultrasonography and angiography. A preoperative arteriogram is considered to be the definitive method to evaluate arterial anatomy, patency, and collateralization between the radial and ulnar arteries. The current article presents the authors’ experience with a patient who had a delayed Allen's test and a normal arteriogram of his left upper extremity, and who developed acute intraoperative hand ischemia, requiring reconstruction of his radial artery, after elevation of a radial forearm free flap. Although exceedingly rare, the occurrence of acute vascular insufficiency is always a possibility and must be kept in mind when harvesting a radial forearm free flap. The surgeon should be prepared to perform an interposition vein graft reconstruction to avoid any potential complications. Clinical examination and judgment may be more important than radiological studies in certain cases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".