MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4245085136 · doi:10.4337/9781848445116.00005

Preface and acknowledgements

2008· book-chapter· en· W4245085136 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEdward Elgar Publishing eBooks · 2008
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStonefly species taxonomy and ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAustralian Research Council
KeywordsHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 'lost decade' of economic stagnation in Japan during the 1990s has become a 'found decade' for regulatory and institutional reform.With nearly all areas of the 'law in the books' reviewed, revised and rewritten, the Japanese legal system is no longer the system that foreign commentators felt they were finally starting to understand by the 1980s.Nowhere is this more evident than in corporate governance.Corporate and securities legislation has been comprehensively revamped over 1993-2007, creating a more flexible and transparent regime for shareholders and managers.Financial markets law and regulatory institutions have changed, too, creating a new context for Japan's 'main banks' as alternative or additional outside monitors of managerial performance in borrowing firms.Even the legislation surrounding labour relations has been amended, reinforcing the 'lifelong' security privileges for elite employee-stakeholders, yet also hastening the growth of other 'atypical' employment relationships.But how do such legislative reforms affecting key players in Japanese firms, covering areas central to the design of Japanese capitalism, play out in the 'law in action'?Overall, this book argues that a significant 'gradual transformation' has occurred.Although this is evident also in other advanced industrialised democracies, such as Germany, Japan reveals especially complex interactions in the various fields that sometimes emphasise different ways of achieving such transformation.The book integrates studies of lifelong employment, main bank financing, insider and outsider governance structures, closely-held companies, corporate law practice, and takeovers and M&A (mergers and acquisitions).The authors hail from diverse backgrounds and disciplines: practitioners and academics; lawyers and political scientists; early-career researchers and mid-career professors; Australian and Japanese (and, for good measure, American, Canadian and New Zealander, too!).They were brought together, along with almost 300 others worldwide, by the Australian Network for Japanese Law (ANJeL).ANJeL was created by the editors' law schools to promote research, teaching and broader community engagement in Japanese law, especially in Australia.Several of this book's chapters stem from presentations at ANJeL's annual conferences on Japanese law.These activities have

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEdward Elgar Publishing eBooksSame topicStonefly species taxonomy and ecologyFrench-language works237,207